this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
174 points (91.8% liked)

Atheism

4046 readers
8 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Well that's may be your belief but the consensus among historians is that there was a man called Jesus of Nazareth that existed.

But many religions create their own alternate versions of history, so I wouldn't expect atheism to be any different. But it's important to recognize it as a belief and understand your belief is inconsistent with the consensus of experts in the relevant field.

[–] cranakis@reddthat.com 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Atheism is as much a religion as not playing any sports is a sport.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Eh, based on how many people put so much effort into treating their lack of interest in sports as a personality trait, and in demonstrating how they don't care about sports even more than other people who don't care about sports...the analogy seems...at least amusing if not entirely accurate.

[–] cranakis@reddthat.com 8 points 9 months ago

In my experience "atheism is a religion" is only an argument religious ppl make when they have no real argument otherwise. It's semantics and frankly, who cares? Call it a religion if you like. Idgaf.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

"I hate the NY Yankees, but I'm not a sports fan" said no one ever.

[–] cranakis@reddthat.com 6 points 9 months ago

How about "I used to be a fan but the Yankee's fucking ruined the entire sport for me?"

[–] cheesorist@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I hate all teams equally.

[–] Rediphile@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

"I hate God" said no atheist ever.

[–] Rediphile@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You say it like it matters if the experts said otherwise. Like if the consensus was there never was a Jesus of Nazareth, would you no longer have that oh so important 'faith'?

[–] Sadbutdru@sopuli.xyz 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What makes you think SpaceCowboy has a religious faith? Nothing they've said in this comment gave me that signal. Fwiw I am not religious, but I know religious people who I respect, and who are intelligent, rational people, knowledgeable about and interested in science and history etc. I don't think having 'faith' automatically makes a person stupid or contemptible, and I don't think being an atheist automatically means you're more rational or intelligent than someone else

[–] Rediphile@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

Their reference to atheism as a religion (it isn't) which 'creates its own history' tipped me off.

And their lack of reply to my simple question really says it all. A non-religious could simply reply 'no, obviously I would not believe in him if the experts consensus was they did not exist'. SpaceCowboy however cannot state this, as my suspicion is the expert consensus has no impact on their beliefs whatsoever. Which I was I asked ... why even talk about the expert consensus at all?

Also this comment chain further reinforces my view. Referring to atheists as 'they' implies SpaceCowboy is not an atheist.

And I'd argue that you actually don't know any truly 'rational' people who are also religious as those concepts are fundamentally at odds with each other. There is no rational basis for the supernatural. I'm sure they are generally nice, well-meaning, intelligent and knowledgeable people though, most religious people I know are too. And yes I also know asshole atheists too, lots of them. But I don't see what that has to do with what I stated/asked. I made no assessment on religious or non-religious people being good or bad, smart or stupid. I made no claim that atheists are magically more rational or intelligent than someone else, although on average they may be but I would have to review the data before jumping to any conclusions. I didn't attack SpaceCowboy in any way, I just asked a simple question.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There were hundreds of men named Jesus, it was a popular name during that time. Also, prophets were everywhere. So it stands to reason there was probably a prophet named Jesus during that time period. The "Jesus" talked about in the Bible? Lol nah.

[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What do you think is more likely: disciples telling taller and taller tales after their master died that spun out into the Bible after a while, or a mythological preacher being invented a few decades after his death?

From what I understand, the consensus view of historians is that Moses and the exodus is probably wholly legendary - there's no archeological evidence of the exodus and the Torah was written 500+ years after the events supposedly happened.

By contrast, the earliest sources for Jesus are from within a century of his death. It's way more likely that we have a mythologized story of a real preacher named Jesus than that we have a wholly legendary story.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

First, there is no consensus, a fairly small group of mostly religious historians believe that.

Second I gave you, by far, the most likely answer.