PC Gaming

8561 readers

1005 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca

UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

400

Starfield has lost 97% of its Steam players in less than six months (archive.is)

submitted 9 months ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

163 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] LoamImprovement@beehaw.org 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I have a hard time believing they spent one year on this game, let alone eight. Half of it, including the game's engine, the leveling system, and the fucking dragonshouts in space, is pulled from existing sources, the writing sucks, the base building is a pointless perk sink, there's maybe three dozen unique structures copy-pasted again and again, the enemies are spongy and boring as hell, and despite being Bethesda's "Least Buggy" work to date, it's still chock-a-block with bugs.

You know what I think? I think they jerked around exactly like Randy Pitchford did with DNF and they're trying to pretend they didn't.