politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
That's what I hate about the:
Like, I'd rather have both my legs cut off than my head, most people would.
But people ain't going to stand in like 5 hours after work to pick. Because for a lot of us, having both legs cut off is just a slower death
Because America doesn't have basic social systems to care for us, and we'd get bankrupted by the medical bills
That's the choice:
Meanwhile neoliberals don't understand why 1/3 of voters don't vote
45% of voters didn't vote when it was a 54 year old vs a 52 year old in 2000 Bush v Gore. It's not the age thing.
The nepotism baby of HW, and one of the least charismatic people to run for president...
Wonder why turnout was low...
Meanwhile look at 92 and 08 when two of our youngest presidents ever, and they blow out everyone around them.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout_in_United_States_presidential_elections
2004 was only as high as it was because it was Bush after 9/11.
But seriously though, trying to pass off Al Gore as a "young" candidate at 52 is hilarious, that man came out of the womb with bifocals complaining about "kids these days".
The sheer audacity of claiming 52 is young just highlights how normalized this has become. A 52 year old running for their first term should already be considered too old.
High voter turnout in 08? But McCain was 72! Guess it's not the age thing.
I don't know if it would be worse if you were being sincere or trying to troll...
But neither is a good look, have fun whatever you're doing I guess
It's a bit morbid, but thank goodness for COVID happening when it did as that forced the rapid expansion of early and mail in voting which helps mitigate this issue without addressing it directly.
I don't think there's enough political will to do the sensible thing, make Election Day a federal holiday, because that would promote access to democracy to the lower classes and that is a threat to both parties.
All making it a holiday would accomplish is giving bankers the day off while most of everyone else who works for a living would still have work. On a day the buses aren't running because it's a holiday.
But now we have a holiday, so there's no need for early voting.
Hmm, I think that's a very fair point. It seems very unlikely that the US would accommodate a holiday without asking service workers to work through it, or even incentivize it with extra pay.
Do you think compulsory voting, like in Australia, would be more effective, then? Or perhaps another alternative?
I'd prefer universal mail ballot like Colorado and Washington have.
Lol, this guy thinks the majority of workers get holidays off...
The solution is making it a week. Give people a full ass week to vote, count em up at the end of the week.
I'm not sure what country you're referring to, but if you're referring to the US then you're spouting false information. Be a better person than spreading sensationalized misinformation for karma.
https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/how-many-workers-get-paid-holidays-off/
You could have at least read the part you quoted chief...
So 1/4 dont get holidays, and of the 75% who do, "many" still work.
You're also ignoring that the 75% include everyone that gets a single day off. And acting like they'd also get this new holiday off.
Can you show me where the "majority" don't get holidays?