Technology

59653 readers

3594 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

572

Apple Vision Pro Owners Are Struggling to Figure Out What They Just Bought (nymag.com)

submitted 9 months ago by psychothumbs@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

278 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You missed the news, I guess.

Apple fully admitted a few times that it was intentional. It was 100% an artificially created mechanism to polarize users, and bully them into Apple's "ecosystem".

[–] theherk@lemmy.world -4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I didn’t miss that; that just isn’t what it says. Well it is what you say, but that’s not what I’m disagreeing with. I agree with you.

iMessage on Android would simply serve to remove an obstacle to iPhone families giving their kids Android Phones.

I’m not saying it isn’t a dirty business trick design to lock consumers in. It is. I’m saying it isn’t clear to me that it is designed as a social status issue. That was driven by a large group the users. Even still what this article is talking about is not having iMessage on android, which is not at all what I was disputing. I’m saying the colors serve a functional purpose. Not saying “only a functional purpose” but useful nevertheless.

I won’t be surprised if android likewise distinguishes between sms and messages using the new protocol.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

so you just defend everything apple does but you agree it's dirty bullshit.

nice! seems like you pick winners bud.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is truly a dizzying exchange. What I said was three things. The bubbles are designed to, at least in part, distinguish message protocol, the zealous conspicuous consumers are responsible for making it a status symbol, and not porting the system to android for vendor lock-in is a scummy process. I am really struggling to see me defend Apple in this case.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

the zealous conspicuous consumers are responsible

They are, and Apple consistently does things the way to let that work.