this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
323 points (92.2% liked)

World News

38530 readers
1536 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

What's America's view on this Tucker Carlson?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because our "free press" is just the "ad fee press" now. Their ONLY concern is how much they can profit off of news coverage. Outrage = clicks/views = ad revenue.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's what happens when people don't want to pay for anything, including journalism.

What are the first 15 comments everytime someone posts a NYT article? "oh, no, paywall, fuck the NYT, greedy Bastards what money for their work".

You end up with tabloids, clickbait and ad infested shit pages.

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

No, it is just a plain defect of capitalistic monetization schemes not aligning with what is good for society. Also, for-profit news stink of corruption and bourgeoisie propaganda with added deficiency of boring clickbait tabloid shitreads more adequate as toilet paper.

[–] Tja@programming.dev -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes, state run media never has propaganda. Glory to the Supreme Leader!

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

We are talking about financing. You calling it "state run" only serves to reveal your own bias. It is very much possible to have non profit independent news as well as public funded news outside of politicians control. We have this in Norway, which is really fucking important because one fucking company has bought all for profit news agencies.

Speaking of glory to the supreme leader, the company in question is also privately held like some sort of Succession fantasy.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes, Norway, the richest country of the world per capita, a very relatable and reproducible system.

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Let us not pretend it is that much of an expense to have national public broadcast services. There is also PBS in the US, SVT in Sweden, BBC in the UK and so on. Just admit your point was pointless and the cherry picking was done on your side and move on.

[–] Tja@programming.dev -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I (who didn't provide examples) was cherry picking. Do you even know what that expression means?

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Are you saying I was wrong for assuming you had examples in mind and that your claim was baseless? Either way, using the term supreme leader ironically is top notch lib edgelord rhetoric in the absence of understanding power dynamics.

[–] Tja@programming.dev -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Was definitely wrong to think you had some sense

[–] Tja@programming.dev -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You have yet to make an actual argument, which lowers the bar for what I am willing to contribute back.

[–] Tja@programming.dev -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I made my argument like 7 messages back, you decided to ignore it, because some petrostate has a lot of money, and then hurl insults.

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

You just said you did not have any examples to back your claim. Hence it is not an argument, but, as said, a baseless claim.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 7 months ago

I didn't say that, but make your strawman.