this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
122 points (94.9% liked)

Australia

3614 readers
65 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 23 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Nothing is as draconian as school uniforms. School uniforms don't solve the inequality problem at all as there are always other personal belongings where it can be demonstrated. That being said, any institution that decides what clothes someone else should or should not wear is deeply authoritarian. Of course, there may be certain scenarios where such authoritarianism is necessary. Schools however do not fit such scenarios.

[–] toast@retrolemmy.com 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Agreed. At the my kids' school (this was years ago), shirts and pants were part of the uniform, but socks weren't regulated. Saw so many kids wearing goofy socks and carrying other things to just to differentiate.

The parents that had pushed for uniforms to be adopted (the principal relented to their demands while my kids were attending) admitted they mainly wanted uniforms so they wouldn't have to deal with their children's clothing choices/wishes. Reaction among parents was split, largely on gender lines (not the parents', but their kids' gender).

[–] psud@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I had uniform shirt, tie, slacks, socks, jumpers, blazer, bag

The shoes weren't uniform but were of very limited style.

You could pick something about wealth by how neatly kids were dressed (and the state of their clothes; the cheapest were nearly worn out), and the toys they brought to school

Hats weren't regulated because it was the '80s and '90s and we didn't wear hats. We had a uniform hat in our sports uniform but it wasn't popular

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Like... How is it more difficult to say "no" to your kids than changing public policy regarding what clothes individuals wear? How are these kids supposed to be responsible individuals of the future who protect freedom for all, when they are taught to obey orders about their clothing choices from a bureaucracy of old people? How is this not indoctrination in obeying authority without question?

[–] Suspiciousbrowsing@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh my.. you might be getting just slightly carried away there

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee -1 points 9 months ago

Am I though? What are the Hijab bans, drag queen bans, etc. then? Are they simply not extensions of these policies? Making it acceptable to regulate clothing (when there is no need to do so) in schools will ultimately lead to it applying for adults as well. Which uhh is actively happening?

[–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Tell me you’re not a parent without telling me you’re not a parent.

Draconian? My kids wear a school polo over regular blue shorts and sneakers, public school isn’t like Hogwarts.

I’d much rather get them to wear that than fuck around making sure their favourite shirt is washed or having to buy some name brand shirt because the cool kids all have one.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not a parent, but I graduated from highschool a few years back. Our school had compulsory uniforms. Clothes and general appearance are integral to one's personality. After I got out of high school, I had absolutely no dressing sense. I had no idea what clothes I liked, what styles I liked, what colors I liked n so on. School was my life. Outside school, I didn't hang out with my buddies outside of sports related activities. Hence, casual wear was an afterthought.

After I got out of school though, I began to explore and unlocked a part of my identity that had been forcefully locked away by school. Today, I don't buy any expensive or branded clothes at all. I choose my clothes based on their color and style. I'm not the show off type in any sphere of my life, because I wasn't raised that way. I was told "no" whenever it was necessary. You know... Parenting?

Don't your kids do their own laundry? Also, can't you say "no" to kids for that hypothetical expensive branded shirt?

Is it really worth stifling your kids' identity for convenience?

[–] runjun@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Did you wear no clothes in the evening or on the weekend? I have a lot of residual shame from dressing “poor” in comparison to peers at school. Also, there’s going to be dress codes regardless, which is also stifling individuality. That is usually packaged in sexism as well.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Did you wear no clothes in the evening or on the weekend?

I did, but I wasn't with my peers then. So I kinda didn't have a point of reference for this. When I was with my peers, I was in athletic wear which again, the school picked out for us.

I have a lot of residual shame from dressing “poor” in comparison to peers at school.

I'm sorry for that... I'm sure there are many who feel the same as you. But is it worth enforcing school uniforms to protect these kids while stifling the identity of others? Is it worth normalising steep authoritarianism for this?

Also, there’s going to be dress codes regardless, which is also stifling individuality. That is usually packaged in sexism as well.

Exactly. All of which is wrong. School uniforms normalise bs like this, which is why they shouldn't exist.

[–] runjun@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm sorry for that... I'm sure there are many who feel the same as you. But is it worth enforcing school uniforms to protect these kids while stifling the identity of others? Is it worth normalising steep authoritarianism for this?

Society already imposes a dress code. Even without laws, a person that goes against the grain will be ostracized to varying degrees. People will refuse to interact with you or refuse to provide services or prohibit you from working for them. Even the amount of clothes is enforced as you can’t even just walk around naked without consequences in most locations.

Exactly. All of which is wrong. School uniforms normalise bs like this, which is why they shouldn't exist.

I don’t think what you’re saying is necessarily incorrect as it can be very easily used to reinforce authoritarian ideals. But most US schools don’t have uniforms but they have you say the pledge of allegiance which is way weirder in my opinion. Now, most kids mumble through and legally they can’t make you say it. But like I was saying above, if you outright refuse then you could be ostracized by your peers or leadership which is traumatizing too.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee -1 points 9 months ago

Society already imposes a dress code. Even without laws, a person that goes against the grain will be ostracized to varying degrees. People will refuse to interact with you or refuse to provide services or prohibit you from working for them.

Which is absolutely wrong. If we want to protect the liberty of all, then we must move away from such an archaic culture.

Even the amount of clothes is enforced as you can’t even just walk around naked without consequences in most locations.

This most likely will pin me as a radical, but I would argue that the right to nudity is extremely important and must be protected. Mark my words- you will see a social movement for this too once the other pro-liberty movements become successful-ish (like the LGBTQ movement).

But most US schools don’t have uniforms but they have you say the pledge of allegiance which is way weirder in my opinion.

Absolutely! Indoctrination at its finest!