this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
170 points (100.0% liked)

196

16460 readers
1896 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] festus@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My guess is 'recessive', in the context of dominant and recessive genes. The only time I can remember 'dominant' from when I took biology.

[–] Steve@compuverse.uk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's probably what they were looking for.

In that context, I might argue the actual opposite would be non-coding DNA. As both dominant and recessive are still functional DNA, they're not so much opposites as they are alternatives.

But I've made those kinds of arguments in school enough, to know the teacher still probably wouldn't accept my debating semantics. Even if they admit I'm right.

Yeah i did that a fair bit in school until i realised that everyone doesnt literally mean everything they say.

So the reason people get snippy is that they think you know what they meant but are nitpicking to be disruptive, since everyone should have understood what was meant, to their minds.