Technology

58055 readers

4884 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

People are worried that AI will take everyone’s jobs. We’ve been here before. (www.technologyreview.com)

submitted 7 months ago by Womble@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In a 1938 article, MIT’s president argued that technical progress didn’t mean fewer jobs. He’s still right.

Compton drew a sharp distinction between the consequences of technological progress on “industry as a whole” and the effects, often painful, on individuals.

For “industry as a whole,” he concluded, “technological unemployment is a myth.” That’s because, he argued, technology "has created so many new industries” and has expanded the market for many items by “lowering the cost of production to make a price within reach of large masses of purchasers.” In short, technological advances had created more jobs overall. The argument—and the question of whether it is still true—remains pertinent in the age of AI.

Then Compton abruptly switched perspectives, acknowledging that for some workers and communities, “technological unemployment may be a very serious social problem, as in a town whose mill has had to shut down, or in a craft which has been superseded by a new art.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Are there any technologies that ended up being disruptive, but at the time, you thought "wow, what a load of hot air?. What about the opposite?

[–] BurnSquirrel@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

For a fizzle, its a little deep in the weeds, but network automation was totally overblown. 10-15 years ago it was said all the network guys would be coders and never touch a physical network device again. Nowadays, most of the services that do this are either jenky and bad, locked to a single vendor, or both, and most of the idea of "coding" is kind of abstracted from it. Some places build their own code infrastructure for networking but it's usually just a few specialized devops guys, supporting a full network team, and making the benign changes that don't require much though. It just never materialized like they predicted it would. It will someday, it's just long been delayed.

For a flash, I'd say cloud services, but it hasn't lead to the mass lay offs of sys admins like was originally predicted. Sys admins traded fussing about wattages and rackspace for build more complicated logical infrastructures for servers they can spin up out of nothing.