politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Didn’t she have a gaming laptop computer at the beginning of the trial in court? Game on!
I'm surprised how noteworthy people find this
Because it's funny either way.
Is she a legitimate attorney who is also a gamer and uses the same laptop for work so she can squeeze in some Rocket League during court recesses?
Or is she technologically incompetent, and bought an expensive laptop she didn't realize was the wrong tool for the job? She's proven she's incompetent as a lawyer, being unsavvy with tech is just icing on that cake.
Or maybe it's her nephew's gaming rig, and she's borrowing it for her big court case.
A gaming laptop is very capable for her work. It just doesn’t look professional for said work.
“360-noscopes” trough the courtroom.
I truly hope the announcer for Unreal Tournament would narrate that.
"POOR LEGAL ARGUMENT", "DENIED", "CONTEMPT OF COURT". I get shivers thinking of that.
its like Joe Pesci's suit in my cousin vinny. like she had some misadventures in a net cafe.
I can imagine a panicked conversation at the nearest Walmart, "I was the only one without a laptop, and I need one, and it just needs to be able to handle whatever."
Is it still funny if it turns out to be the court’s laptop used for the live transcription feed? Because that’s what she claimed on Xitter.
Given the rest of the horseshit she's slung since she got hired away from working parking ticket cases, I'm inclined not to believe this.
But yes, that would also be quite funny.
Yeah, it's still a little funny, but at the expense of the court.
I'm sure she just asked IT for the most powerful laptop she could get, and IT just shrugged and got out the corporate card. Or she games in her time off. Who knows, who cares.
It just doesn't look professional. You don't need a big GPU and RGB lights to open a web browser and PDF files.
Well it was not a good look.
Why though?
I am sure a proper gaming laptop can do anything a lawyer needs it to do.
Overspecced and overpriced for its job?
Probably, but whatever? Noone would have batted an eye if she turned up with an equally expensive Apple product.
Edit: And I am not arguing that she is an idiot or that I have tremendous Schadenfreude towards both her and Trump.
I just don't get why a gaming laptop is a bad thing to use.
RGB lights and tacticool styling are distracting and unprofessional in court, maybe.
There's nothing wrong with the laptop itself. But it doesn't really belong in that context.
Male lawyers still wear carefully tailored business suits even when the rest of the business world has gone more casual. Female lawyers likewise tend to wear a higher level of business attire than typical in other office environments.
Language is also more formal; I had jury duty once, and the defense lawyer mentioned his client by first name. The judge reminded him that they address people formally by last name in court. (That guy came off like a relatively new lawyer working his way up in the public defender system; Trump would probably be better off hiring him than anybody he's actually getting, but that guy is also probably smart enough not to.)
How lawyers present themselves in court and in front of clients is very important. A gaming laptop with unicorn puke RGB is not a good look.
I dunno.. RGB and underglow lights cycling between orange and blue looks pretty amazing.
Lmao you’re right she had a RoG laptop at the start of it
And it wasn’t even hers. The gaming laptop belonged to the court and was used for the live transcript feed.
I have a hard time believing that to be honest
I don't, wasting taxpayer money is something we do a lot at all levels of government.
That only happens in the wet dreams that conservatives have. You then wake up, satisfied that your view of reality is the only one.
Nah, that's exactly the kind of thing that happens when they send an intern out to buy equipment.