this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
134 points (89.9% liked)

Games

16651 readers
591 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

After laying off almost 2,000 people, Xbox finds itself in a position at odds with the community-first image it has cultivated for itself.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why would you ever think any company is "on your side"? They're on their own side. If they make products you like and operate in a way you like, I recommend supporting them, but that still doesn't mean they're "on your side."

Promote products, not companies. A company can change overnight, whereas a product that you own won't.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why would you ever think any company is “on your side”?

ABK employees, apparently. See this from almost exactly one year ago: https://www.kotaku.com.au/2022/01/activision-blizzard-employees-react-to-xbox-acquisition/

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Idk, that doesn't mean MS is "on their side," just not as bad as Activision Blizzard.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

just not as bad as Activision Blizzard.

2000 people may disagree.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Are you sure? Would those 2000 people apply at Activision Blizzard if MS hadn't bought them? If they had the same offer in hand to work at Xbox vs Activision Blizzard, which would they choose?

I'm guessing they still prefer Xbox, though they're probably not happy about being laid-off.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Are you sure?

No. That's why I used the word "may". Look it up.