this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
1262 points (95.6% liked)

News

23661 readers
4639 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

let's gooo

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 15 points 11 months ago (5 children)

If the US president got elected by getting the most votes, there wouldn't have been a Republican since Bush senior. I really don't understand why electoral reform is not higher on the political agenda in the US.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 months ago

Having it based purely on a popular vote will still wind up with a 2 party system. Ranked voting needs to be implemented. All of the benefits of a popular vote, with actual checks and balances to elevate 3rd parties.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

This was the deal with the devil that people in the North made with people in the South to convince people in the South to join them in a government specifically set up to defy the British. The US as a democracy has always failed because it was designed to give ultimate executive power to the states rather than to the people.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 3 points 11 months ago

The Democratic party and Republican party are united in their opposition to electoral reform because they both benefit the most from it.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Because the DNC enjoys power more than democracy and does not allow such things to happen.

[–] Clent@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's right wing spin.

Only the politically ignorant believe it.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lol. No. Only the politically ignorant think that the DNC is anything but a power hungry juggernaut, set on choosing candidates based on their own agenda regardless of the will of the people. They don't even really seem to care if their candidate gets elected.

I really don't understand how more of a fuss wasn't made when they cheated Bernie out of a fair shot, were sued by donors and used the defense "We were so blatantly favoring our favorite that anyone who thought we were being impartial wasn't paying attention and deserved to be swindled out of their money! Yes, we broke rules to get Sanders out of the running, but we were very obvious about it and they were our own rules and we can break them if we want, so get fucked." And the court was like.. "Yeah... sounds good."

https://observer.com/2017/08/court-admits-dnc-and-debbie-wasserman-schulz-rigged-primaries-against-sanders/

[–] Clent@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

You're still hurting over Bernie. That's cute.

Politically that was a long time ago and you're still holding a grudge over it. This is why the Democrats lose.

Many on the left needs to be placated with something new every election cycle while the right votes without any hesitation.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

The DNC would actually benefit here because the popular vote would always bring in a Democrat. It's the small, red states that will never let change happen because Wyoming enjoys having more direct representation than California.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The PEOPLE would benefit since they are the ones doing the voting, not the states. It is just as ridiculous that Republicans in California have little say in the presidency as Democrats in Wyoming.

[–] nybble41@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago

It is just as ridiculous that Republicans in California have little say in the presidency as Democrats in Wyoming.

The Republicans in California have a better chance of seeing a Republican president with the electoral college than they would with a national popular vote, even if their particular votes carry less weight. In a sense that gives them more representation in the end, not less—their voices are ignored but they get what they wanted anyway.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Or because it would take a constitutional amendment. The only way around that would be making the electoral college irrelevant via the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact which has largely only been signed by democratic leaning states. In fact, of the states that have passed it, zero have been right leaning.

There are certainly shitty corporate democrats that do fall into your category but to say the party as a whole is that way is ignorant.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 11 months ago

That must be why Republican-dominated states have passed the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. /s