this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
256 points (97.1% liked)

Not The Onion

11840 readers
183 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick had a few choice words for the public on his way out the door of the Pentagon's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's a great point I was unaware of, thank you.

Do you have a relevant link?

[–] Sl00k@programming.dev 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately not many reporters are reporting on this sincerely besides TheHill and Newsweek, although it's slowly becoming more sincere.

Here's an opinion piece that describes the situation when it originally started last year and contains a pretty accurate non biased overview.

Most recently there was a SCIF held on January 10th with the UAP caucus, and the IG regarding the Grusch claims. NY times article where some Congress people substantiating a few of Grusch claims.

Also a very important to note, in general this is a very non-partisan issue (Republicans are definitely the most outspoken though). A UAP bill was put forward by Chuck Schumer in December to be included in the NDAA, which would declassify UAP materials that didn't expose national security, and force all UAP materials to be returned to the US Government. It was unfortunately gutted by the House during negotiations (specifically by Congressmen lobbied by defense contractors). Take that as you will, but I think the fact that this is being discussed to be codified in law and not entirely hidden behind the executive branch with zero oversight is great for both the public.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

Those are both interesting articles, thanks, although the first is written assuming the reader has so much knowledge about what's been going on between the intelligence community and congressional disclosure and oversight that I'll have to read it again a few times to really understand what he's saying.

I also think it's great that the extraterrestrial question is at least being discussed and investigated with some form of earnestness, even if in classified meetings.