this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
95 points (92.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43874 readers
2544 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It is becoming near impossible to find relevant information from search engines. Duckduckgo, SearXNG, Bing, Google, and so many more mainstream engines have a significantly high noise to signal ratio, and it is getting worse.

Here are a collection of the best search engines I know, please add more to the list.

If no more high quality search engines exist, would it be possible to host your own?

EDIT: Some new discoveries. The addon uBlacklist and filters can block super SEO sites from appearing in search.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lovesickoyster@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago (4 children)

no mention of kagi yet? Son, I am disappoint.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 22 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I'm really happy with Kagi. The fact that I can blacklist certain domains from showing up in search results is chef's kiss.

Back when I switched from Google to DuckDuckGo, I found myself occasionally using the !g bang to fall back to Google results. So far I haven't felt the need once in Kagi.

[–] Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is like the 18th time I've seen people on Lemmy say good things about kagi, so I just bit the bullet. I like ecosia but I still end up going back to google for some searches, so I'll see how kagi does for me.

[–] cosmic_slate@dmv.social 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I’ve been using it for months and maybe popped back over to Google only a handful of times.

DDG is okay but it’s miserable in comparison. I haven’t tried Ecosia long enough to form a proper opinion but my first impressions weren’t great.

The only people who actively rail against it seem to be the standard group of Fediverse who are… a bit too online πŸ˜‰

[–] Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah, since posting that i've been searching random niche things I've attempted with other search engines (like info on obscure instruments and foreign fashion subcultures) and yeah, Kagi is by and large the most useful I've tried. I search for something and it's not just pages of the most normie websites talking about things semi-adjacent to what I searched for, and not an advert in sight! I think I'm in love.

[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I'm also very happy with kagi. I get search results with no fluff to sort through or scroll past every time I search. It's such a breath of fresh air.

Kagi is also doing some interesting things with search and many, many things that let you customize how the results are presented to you.

Also, intesrtingly, kagi is growing rapidly and as yet they have spent literally zero dollars on advertisements. Purely word of mouth.

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

I've felt the need a couple times but Google results were always worse.

[–] MSids@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

They are high thinking people will pay $5/mo for search AND being limited to 300 searches/mo. I avoid subscriptions at all cost, so if I were ever to consider paying for search it would need to be a completely forgettable number like .99/mo.

[–] lovesickoyster@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

you are still paying for search, you just don't know it (yet).

[–] MSids@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's not lost on me, I get it, don't pretend like you're the only one who understands how advertising works on the Internet. That's the agreement with anything you don't directly pay for. The fee that Kago is asking for is unreasonable in my opinion.

[–] lovesickoyster@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

sure, we all value things differently. For me this subscription is nothing but a rounding error.

[–] Eddyzh@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you are not paying for it you are not the customer but the product.

[–] Caligvla@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 9 months ago

Man I sure love Microsoft, they don't treat me like a product since I pay for all their services and Windows, unlike that filth Linux which is full of data harvesting CIA spyware and ads.

[–] TwinTusks@bitforged.space 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I only heard of Kagi in lemmy, very intrigued, however as I lived in third-world country, the price plan is unfeasible for me to consider.

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You get the first hundred a month for free.

Maybe you could ration it for when you need high-quality searches?

[–] TwinTusks@bitforged.space 2 points 9 months ago

You get the first hundred a month for free

Thats more rational, I thought it was just the first hundred searches were free.

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Isn't there that whole controversy with kagi going on about ~~transphobia~~ homophobia stuff?

Edit: apparently it was homophobia not transphobia.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 8 points 9 months ago

Kagi has recently started getting part of its search results from Brave's search index. That's literally all there is to it.

[–] lovesickoyster@lemmy.world -5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

ah, cancel culture at its best, I won't be part of it. I took one look at these people, and when I see them cry racism over a completely benign website I know I should just ignore them.

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

So separating the art from the artist?