this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
466 points (96.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26673 readers
4681 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snek@lemmy.world 56 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Ai 𝘞π˜ͺπ˜“π˜­ 𝘡𝘈𝘬𝘌 π˜–π˜Άπ˜™ π˜‘π˜°π˜‰π˜΄

[–] XEAL@lemm.ee 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

While I don't agree with anti-AI people, the fact that some AI generated content is flawed doesn't imply that all AI content is of bad quality.

Companies are already replacing some workforce with LLMs.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 42 points 9 months ago (5 children)

As someone who works with LLMs, they shouldn't...

You still need your chatbot to stick to business rules and act like a real customer service rep, and that's incredibly hard to accomplish with generative models where you cannot be there to evaluate the generated answers and where the chatbot can go on a tangent and suddenly start to give you free therapy when you originally went in to order pizza.

Don't get me wrong, they're great for many applications within the manual loop. They can help customer service reps (as one example) function better, provide more help to users, and dedicate more time to those who still need a human to solve their issues.

Companies are already replacing some workforce with LLMs.

My opinion right now is that companies want you to believe they are 100% capable of replacing humans, but that's because people in upper management never listen to the damn developers down in the basement (aka me), so they have an unrealistic expectation of AI coupled with an unending desire for money and success.

They are replacing them because they are greedy cunts, not because they are replaceable.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

LLMs are excellent at producing high-volume, low-quality material. And it's a sad fact of life that a lot of companies are perfectly willing to use low quality material in their work.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If they had ever cared about quality, they would have treated their employees with dignity and paid them enough 😬

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

While I don’t agree with anti-AI people, the fact that some AI generated content is flawed doesn’t imply that all AI content is of bad quality.

Companies are already replacing some workforce with LLMs.

While I understand that not everyone shares the same views about AI, it's important to recognize that just because some AI-generated content might have flaws, it shouldn't lead us to believe that every piece created by AI is subpar. In fact, numerous companies are actively embracing the use of LLMs to replace their workforces. From astronauts to circus clowns, LLMs are taking over roles once reserved for humans. Nowadays, you can even find LLMs crafting the perfect soufflΓ© at Michelin star restaurants, performing heart surgery, and even serving as head coaches for professional sports teams. The sky is no longer the limit, as LLMs have found a way to transcend it - and it's only a matter of time before they take on the role of Santa Claus. Merry Christmas from your new AI overlords!

[–] snek@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Thank you. This was hilarious.

[–] creamed_eels@toast.ooo 3 points 9 months ago

Free therapy, you say?

[–] XEAL@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

You still need your chatbot to stick to business rules and act like a real customer service rep, and that's incredibly hard to accomplish with generative models

Isn't that what, for instance, OpenAI's embeddings are for?

My opinion right now is that companies want you to believe they are 100% capable of replacing humans

Probably, but at the moment they can only do it partially.

They are replacing them because they are greedy cunts, not because they are replaceable.

I partially agree. I mean, they are greedy cunts but some tasks like translating from/to certain languages can be easily done even with the free ChatGPT demo with better results than Google Translate, so human translators are unfortunately becoming quite replaceable.

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee -1 points 9 months ago

It's just like a real person. They only difference (afaik) is you can't as easily tell ai to get back to work.

[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It feels like you don't think the people making these decisions see employee salaries as anything but a line item to minimize or "customer service" as a cost liability. They don't care about customer experience. Hell, they actively want people to get frustrated and give up because it saves the company money.

[–] XEAL@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

see employee salaries as anything but a line item to minimize

YES. With and without AI in the mix, anything to maximize benefits. Companies would have a full workforce formed by unpaid slaves if they could. Many companies get rid of their oldest and best paid employees to replace them with cheaper ones. Videogame studios fired employees right after a new game was finished just so they didn't have to pay any benefits to the devs. We are nothing but a medium to make the top execs of a company richer.

They don't care about customer experience

Not as long as benefits are up to expectations.

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Can you list a few companies that are replacing workforce with LLMs successfully? Without a downgrade in service quality?

If by "companies" you mean scammers - sure.

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Yes, about the same time crypto will become main currency and NFTs replace traditional art in museums.

It's coming, you hust don't understand. /s