this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
633 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59201 readers
3394 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 43 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Okay Chrome lovers, talk yourself out of this one…

[–] Toes@ani.social 29 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well you see, it's used by virtually everything. So get used to it. is all I imagine people saying, not my opinion.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 15 points 9 months ago

Ahh yes, the good ole, “you don’t have a choice” nonsense. 😉

[–] Rediphile@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago

I can bitch about chrome all day long... but none of that bitching will be about incognito mode as that was and continues to be an useful feature that did exactly what I expected it to do. Everything it said it did, it did.

Just because people made up their own imaginary ideas about what they think it does isn't really Google's fault. If people think snorkels allow them to scuba dive and then drown, I'm not about to blame the snorkel maker that wrote 'diving googles and snorkel' on the packaging.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I switched away from chrome a while ago, but this is just stupid. Incognito has always said that it can’t stop sties from tracking you. It’s always been about stopping stuff from being stored locally. Here’s the message:

If you read that and thought it did more than it said, that’s on you.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think what people are complaining about is that Google itself is tracking you. Not just with cookies, but with the chrome browser. Everything you do goes back to Google, regardless of their silly Google analytics, JavaScript tag that people block.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hey out of interest, did my comment just show up for you?

Not just with cookies, but with the chrome browser

Wow really? Has that actually been documented? Because yeah, that definitely changes things in my mind.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just like I woke up, but it was probably there for a while.

Regarding documentation… I mean, it’s Google… C’mon. I’m sure there’s lots of stuff about them spying with minimal searching (don’t use Google.com though, hahaha)

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

it was probably there for a while

Nah, it might not have been. Have been dealing with federation issues that I think may only have sorted themselves out mere minutes before your comment.

I’m sure there’s lots of stuff about them spying with minimal searching

Eh, not good enough. They've got a lot of spying, but this is a specific claim. It needs to be supported by specific evidence.

It's like when people claim that Google devices are constantly recording audio and sending it back to base. Nobody has ever found evidence of it, and claims that they are are usually better explained by things like "they are recording your geolocation, and the geolocation of people you're with, and the things that the people you're with are Googling". That's enough data on its own, there's no need to reach for conspiratorial claims that lack evidence.

If there's actual evidence that the browser itself is sending tracking data back while in Incognito which links your non-incognito profile to what you're doing incognito, I'm concerned. But if it's just assumptions people are leaping to, I'm gonna go back to Occam's razor and make fewer assumptions.

[–] RayJW@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

I mean if a class action lawsuit is enough documentation, then here you go: https://www.npr.org/2023/12/30/1222268415/google-settles-5-billion-privacy-lawsuit

This is actually why they implemented this new disclaimer.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Incognito mode didn't do what it was never advertised to do, and in fact does precisely what it always claimed. The horror!

I swear people like you act like every day Google simply exists is a fresh outrage.