this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
64 points (93.2% liked)

Privacy

31958 readers
993 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Age verification without name and surname: this is the way to avoid minors to watch porn.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

The whole age verification can be done privately, secure and without the possibility to get tracked. But imho still not really a good thing to do. Parenting should still be a thing.

Same discussion can be found here https://lemmy.ml/comment/6775132

[–] catfooddispenser@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

Thank you for the links to Wikipedia and identity.com on that other thread. I've yet to wrap my head around how zero-knowledge proof could work for such a basic assertion as "user is of legal age", which calls for a 0 or 1 answer. It seems very different from the examples given of polynomial computations to prove knowledge of an exponent in a complex math expression. I can't see what could prevent any client to simply lie about the answer here.

[–] Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But that refers to personal data, and I suppose the state will be able to identify you and your habits if it gets the logs from the websites.
I wonder if the websites will get a unique identifier, that would allow them to track you so accurately it would make google horny.

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Have you even read the linked Wikipedia or the Website? No. When implemented correctly the math shows that it is not possible.

[–] Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I read the article and did not see where the method is specified, have you even read it?

When implemented correctly

Aha. How bold to assume that they will limit themselves and apply privacy best practices.

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

... All i ever said is that it is possible. And i am referring to the article posted behind the link i posted.

Any implementation can be flawed even if well intentioned. There are implementations of this, for example the German ID Personalausweis has this method implemented.

[–] Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

Okay, now I see which article you are referring to.
I know knowledge-zero, but we have different points, mine was not about the inability to do it but how the government will do it.

It would be very easy for them to justify that they have to identify pedos, I would be very surprised if they would guarantee privacy. But whatever, unfortunately I guess we'll find out.