this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
113 points (88.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27020 readers
1417 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Politicians constantly talk about stopping the illegal immigrants that are coming from Mexico, but putting a wall has never and will never be a solution since the reason why so many displaced keep coming across the border is mostly to escape the crime, corruption, inequality, and violence of they have to live in their home countries. The worst part is that most of these terrible things is that happen in third world countries are rooted in constant subversion by developed countries, primarily the US. I feel like since we caused this (even if in part) we should help stop it now, even if we didn't publicly admit guilt to save face.

So, how do we do it? Do we straight up invade Mexico and go on a full out war against the cartels like we did against Osama Bin Laden?

If not, why not? And, is there anything that can be done?

I would like to keep things civil. Please, let's keep this respectful as I know this is a tough issue and there is anger on both sides of this issue.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AbsurdityAccelerator@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Including stuff like fentanyl and tranq and allow anybody to buy it?

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 41 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Here's the thing - most people aren't actually interested in trying hard drugs. The people who are, will probably obtain them irregardless of legality. Given that, what is the harm in mass legalization? It keeps money out of the cartels and back into the community via taxation; it ensures the drug is pure and safe to consume with no additives; and for the individuals who afterward decide it is not for them, they can get the help that they need without worrying.

[–] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Exactly this. When Portugal decriminalized drugs, they saw a decrease in usage-related deaths, drug crimes, and an increase in rehabilitation. Overall, there has been a decline in drug use as a result.

[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

But you have to put the money into the treatment. Oregon isn’t quite doing that yet, and the lag between legalizing the drugs and actually increasing services has been pretty bad for everyone involved.

Hopefully we get it straightened out in the next year or two.

[–] BobGnarley@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Dont you love how every country in the world just acts like this didnt happen (and still is very successfully)?

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

Predictable dosing will save lives from overdoses.

[–] Cheers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

I'd imagine some sort of NIST to maintain a standard would make it more expensive, which would result in people looking for their local dealers again.

[–] seathru@lemm.ee 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 37 points 10 months ago (2 children)

No. Regulate and offer known recreational drugs pure.

Very few people take fentanyl on its own or intentionally. Even tranq (which I hadn't heard of but just looked up) is primarily harmful because it's often tainted with fentanyl or other potent yet potentially fatal additives. Fentanyl does not need to be legally sold, because there is no real market for it.

Hell, even fucking weed is tainted, primarily with silica-based desccants, in countries where it's still illegal (*cough* UK *cough*).

However if people could get pure, laboratory tested recreational drugs then these issues could disappear overnight. Heroin is bad when you fall deep into addiction, but most heroin users wouldn't get into that state if they could take the drug legally without taboo or victimisation of illicit dealers. 100 years ago opium dens were a thing, and there were some people deep in the poppy - but there were also people just as deep in their alcohol suffering worse. Alcohol is less of a problem today, and back in the 90s there was a study funded by DARE (and subsequently unpublished because they didn't like the results) that determined most heroin users were in fact business men and women earning large salaries with enough income to support their habit with high quality product.

Just like digital piracy is a service problem, drug addiction is a societal mental health problem, and criminalising it only allows the problem to fester to extremes.


Decriminalise possession, keep supply of the most fatally harmful drugs illegal, legitimise and tax known recreational drugs.

[–] novibe@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But if you legalise all drugs, as you say, no one will want to use shit like fent at all. Fent was legal for decades, it’s older than most opioids. It wasn’t an issue until the crackdown on pills.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think possession of any drug should be legal. However, the intent behind its use can still be illegal. If you have fentanyl and can demonstrate you only have it for some genuine use, and aren't looking to cause harm with it, then that shouldn't be a problem. Supplying fentanyl is much more likely to be a harmful circumstance, and its supply should be controlled.

[–] novibe@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

Imo spending the effort to educate people instead of cracking down on sellers or producers makes much more sense.

In a world with clean accessible morphine, no drug user will seek our fentanyl, no matter how easy it is to find.

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'd argue to legalize everything including the extremes and price the extremes to barely undercut and drive out any illicit market. It is always better to have control over a legitimate market than it is to have a black market. There is no way to regulate demand and creating market choke points is totally ineffective. So use state run capitalism to make the market uncompetitive and drive out any competition to gain full control. The State as the dealer makes more sense than the State playing wack-a-mole in the middle.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

I dunno, I think it's more complicated than that. First off, there are some things that should be prohibited - it's illegal to privately own nuclear weapons, for the most extreme example. Second, many of these truly harmful drugs have tiny markets, and these markets are in fact propped up by other, more conventional drugs being illegal. If heroin were legal, very few if any people would even consider fentanyl, such that fentanyl could be prohibited entirely without having an out of control illegal market.

In some sense, though, we do already have a controlled legitimate market for these prohibited things. Even cannabis, even during the prohibition, had some legal purchase avenues for the purpose of research. Even nuclear, that's manufactured by private businesses with permission from the government. That works for the vast majority of drugs, it only fails with popular, relatively low harm recreational drugs where the law just isn't reasonable against the potential harm.

[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

No one wants that crap. When I did drugs I wanted pain pills but they kept cracking down, so here we are with worse stuff.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I don't support that. I support a FDA regulated opiod pill that has known dosages. It will get you high and if you OD posion control knows exactly what to do. Even forgetting about human dignity for a moment, it will save us all money to do it this way. If someone really wants to spend the next 18 hours of their life on a couch zonked out they should it do safely.

The pill will be in certain stores, on the outskirts of town. It will be taxed. You will have to sit through a video on exactly how you are to use it safely. You can camp out in a safe usage site and have a locker for your keys. At least in my ideal version of it.

As expensive as this all is it is nothing compared to what we have now.