this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
160 points (91.7% liked)

Science Fiction

13658 readers
10 users here now

Welcome to /c/ScienceFiction

December book club canceled. Short stories instead!

We are a community for discussing all things Science Fiction. We want this to be a place for members to discuss and share everything they love about Science Fiction, whether that be books, movies, TV shows and more. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow.

  1. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.
  2. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.
  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed
  4. Put (Spoilers) in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers.
  5. Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread.

Lemmy World Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
160
NBC is planning to reboot Battlestar Galactica for the second time. What do you think? (deadline.com)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/sciencefiction@lemmy.world
110 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I am personally against it despite Sam Esmail's involvement (I really liked Mr. Robot). It's not that I don't think it could be a good show, it's that NBC has plenty of other properties from former science fiction shows they could redevelop, but they're redeveloping this one instead.

If they want to reboot a show for the third time, why not V considering the first reboot was so disappointing? Or maybe go for the 90s nostalgia and reboot SeaQuest DSV or Earth 2.

And then there's all the Sci-Fi Channel/SyFy properties they have at least some stake of ownership in.

I realize asking for something original is asking too much these days, but can't we at least do something other than Battlestar Galactica every 20 years?

I'm willing to be open-minded and give the show a chance if it gets produced, but I don't think it should be produced in the first place.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] arquebus_x@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It wasn't awful, it was just hapless. It probably would have gotten its sea legs in a second season.

Sad story: the actress who played the little girl died a day after her honeymoon and 8 days before her 22nd birthday, from a heart attack. (She'd had a heart transplant when she was 15.)

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That’s so sad. She was great on the show, even holding her own alongside the legendary Tim Curry.