this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
157 points (96.4% liked)

Patient Gamers

11445 readers
54 users here now

A gaming community free from the hype and oversaturation of current releases, catering to gamers who wait at least 12 months after release to play a game. Whether it's price, waiting for bugs/issues to be patched, DLC to be released, don't meet the system requirements, or just haven't had the time to keep up with the latest releases.

^(placeholder)^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Are there games that you tried but just couldn't get into because they feel outdated? Games that, in theory, you would enjoy, but don't because the controls, graphics, writing, or mechanics just don't feel good anymore. Games that, compared to today, just don't hold up to your standards.

I recently tried playing Heroes of Might and Magic III, and I realized that a lot of the invisible language used through game design from that era, I do not understand. There are many things that the game didn't explain, and I assume they were just understood by players. Not only that, but I imagine there was a lot of crossover between video games and board games back then, so maybe that language was used as well. I ended up downloading a manual and putting it on my second screen and I get it and played it, but it just wasn't for me.

I also dropped Mirror's Edge, but this time it was because of the graphics. It looks and feels great, but the graphics give me a headache. There is way too much bloom, and for some reason, there are some parts that look like the imaginary lens has been covered in Vaseline. This didn't bother me before, but my eyes are not used to it anymore.

There are also games like the first two Tony Hawk Pro Skater games that I can't fully get into because they're missing mechanics from the later games. The levels and controls feel great, but they don't feel complete without those mechanics. It keeps me from enjoying the games as much as the others.

Please share yours!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] olutukko@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The first witcher. The story seems really interesting and it has some great rpg elements but the combat is just so boring that I ended up startin witcher 3 without knowing the lore

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't think it actually matters for the Witcher series. They don't tend to dwell too much on the events of the previous game.

I assumed that Yen was something from the Witcher 2 (that I skipped), but I don't think she's in that at all. If anything it relies more on the books for the backstory of each game.

Witcher 1 is a very odd game, gameplay-wise, that makes more sense when you realise it was initially some top down D&D game. It's just presented as a regular 3rd person game that we now expect to play somewhat differently, rather than the odd "click the mouse at the right moment" system they went with. It's worth it just for the story. Just turn down the difficulty as it's really not worth struggling with, although for me the hardest boss in the game was a dog near the start.

[–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah I kinda realized the same thing. I might not know everything but witcher 3 with no extra information has been great and I havent felt like I don't know enough to enjoy the lore

[–] euphoric_cat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

should have waited for the remake

[–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Damn I didn't know about that! I'm definetly going to try it out when it gets released

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Witcher 3 actually assumes you've read the books, too, so just playing 1 and 2 wouldn't necessarily have informed you of what was going on.

[–] olutukko@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Huh, good to know. I would love to read the books at some point