this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2023
134 points (96.5% liked)

GenZedong

4186 readers
25 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm certainly not saying Lukashenko isn't in allegiance with the Kremlin, however it's true to say that the Kremlin didn't negotiate down the coup. Lukashenko did.

Also it's most likely these terms were somewhat favourable to Wagner and don't involve its complete integration into Russia's military and directly under MoD control.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm really not sure what point you're trying to make here to be honest. Kremlin found a way to resolve the situation without bloodshed, and where Prigozhin was removed from wagner while preserving wagner as an effective organization. Wagner is in fact now signing contracts with the MoD, so yes it is directly under the control of the MoD going forward. Basically, Russia managed to resolve the situation in the best way possible.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll distill it down for you:

  • The Kremlin didn't find a way to resolve the situation, Lukashenko brokered a deal between Putin and Prigozhin. Without Lukashenko's intervention the Kremlin had no way of backing down. Lukashenko is an ally of the Kremlin, but he is not the Kremlin, and the Kremlin had already taken the position of harsh punishment.
  • I don't think your take is accurate. Wagner isn't directly under the control of MoD, rather some of Wagner's troops are being given the option of joining/signing contracts. In fact, it's only the ones who did not take part that get this option.
  • The implication is that the rest of Prigozhin's troops, perhaps his most loyal and most effective, might be going with him to Belarus.
  • The best way possible would have been to not have the insurrection to begin with. Ideally, by properly supplying troops as promised.
[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If that's what you genuinely believe then what else is there to tell you. I also love how you just made up a whole bunch of stuff like Prigozhin's troops going to Belarus. You could totally get a job at one of US propaganda rags writing nonsense all day.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If that’s what you genuinely believe then what else is there to tell you.

Got to love how ambiguous this statement is. Are you saying it wouldn't have been better to not have an insurrection in the first place?

I also love how you just made up a whole bunch of stuff like Prigozhin’s troops going to Belarus.

I'm not making things up, I'm saying there is an implication that Prigozhin's most loyal troops, at least some of the 5,000-8,000 people who were involved in the march, might be going with him to Belarus. I can't imagine they'll want to stay in Russia any more than Prigozhin after this. They won't be allowed to work with the MoD, but they've been given protection under the deal and they have to go somewhere. Following Prigozhin to Belarus seems most likely.

It's certainly less far fetched than you saying that all of Wagner will be integrated into the MoD, which directly contradicts Dmitry Peskov's statement outlining the deal. Only some of Wagner will be given the opportunity to sign contracts. Up to 20,000 will have the opportunity, but not all will sign.

>PMC contractors who refused to take part in the mutiny - and whole units did not - will be allowed to sign contracts with the Russian Defense Ministry, Peskov said.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are literally making things up here. There is zero actual evidence to support your claim that any wagner troops are following Prigozhin anywhere. You just pulled this out of your ass based what you can and can't imagine, and trying to sell that as some fact here.

Meanwhile, read the link you yourself posted till you understand what it says.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't present anything as fact, you're the one distorting things here. I simply pointed out that many thousands of Wagner troops won't be a part of the Russian military anymore, and suggested that the most likely thing they will do is continue following their current leader.

It seems like a recurring tactic of yours is to deflect people to other things, without actually arguing a single specific point yourself.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is nothing likely about that statement. The fact that you believe an absurdity does not make it likely. The facts don't support your assertions. And I don't need to keep justifying myself to you here. The only recurring tactic here is you confidently asserting nonsensical things and then acting like they're obviously true.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What any reasonable person would do is suggest an alternative likelihood. What will happen to the 5,000+ Wagner troops that the MoD won't allow to sign contracts?

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the 5,000 troops aren't going to be allowed to sign contracts with the MoD then they obviously become civilians. One has to be living in an alternate reality to think that they're just going to follow Prigozhin around like some praetorian guard. The fact that you even consider this to be a likely scenario shows that you have absolutely no understanding of the situation in Russia.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the 5,000 troops aren’t going to be allowed to sign contracts with the MoD then they obviously become civilians.

Most of these troops were part of the Storm-Z forces, people who were taken out of prison and granted freedom in exchange for service.

It's about as likely as Prigozhin making it safely to Belarus. One way or another, many of Prigozhin's troops are probably going to follow him.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You certainly sound like you're an expert on the subject, so whatever you say there.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The other technique you always resort to is attacking the credibility of the person you're arguing with, rather than arguing any specific point. This suggests you know your reasoning is weak.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just to recap, you've made a bunch of speculation that isn't grounded in any actual facts. Then when you got called out on doing that you started spewing more nonsense. Now you're claiming that it's actually my reasoning that's weak. What an utter 🤡 you are.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're completely forgetting the part where you said all of Wagner would be integrated into the Russian military, in contradiction with official statements.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The organization will be integrated, and there will be no more wagner as an independent PMC. It's absolutely hilarious you're still here, it's like you just need to keep talking because deep down you realize how wrong you are and you think that if you just keep adding more comments you'll dig yourself out in some way. 😂

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's hilarious is that you deflect and throw shade rather than admitting your mistake.

Wagner is in fact now signing contracts with the MoD, so yes it is directly under the control of the MoD going forward.

Wagner is not signing contracts, some troops from within Wagner are being given the opportunity to sign contracts. Not all of these will sign.

It's ok to admit you didn't explain things properly, you know. Rather than digging further and hoping you'll either bury others in your piles or get deep enough that no one will bother to look for you anymore.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ahem.

Putin later stated that the Russian authorities would not prosecute Prigozhin or his troops, and offered Wagner fighters a choice to either sign contracts with Russia’s Defense Ministry or other security agencies, return home, or move to neighboring Belarus.

Putin literally offered what I said some troops might do.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's different from your claim that there would be a wagner in Belarus. Anybody with a couple of brain cells to bang together understands that Belarus wouldn't want a rogue PMC any more than Russia would after what happened. It's frankly stunning that you can't understand that and still trying to pretend like you had a valid point. The fact that you're still commenting on this thread is kind of hilarious. Seems like it's living rent free in your head.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where did I say there would be Wagner in Belarus?

How many brain cells do you need to bang together before you start seeing sense?

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just love how you have this compulsive need to reply. Read your comments when you're sober maybe.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have a compulsive need to call out bullshit where I see it, and you just keep giving me compulsions.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If by call out you mean spew, then you're bang on.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where have I said anything that was bullshit? You're the one who kept making statements that contradict official announcements, all in an effort to throw petty insults that don't even hit the mark. You miss on your points, you miss on your attacks.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 year ago

whatever helps you sleep at night

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn lol someone else thinks your replies are low effort. I'm gonna give you an upvote out of sympathy.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 year ago

I definitely exhibit jekyll and hyde characteristics :)

[–] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Luka was almost certainly acting on behalf of the Kremlin because for image purposes the Kremlin could not be seen to be the ones making the offer of leniency to traitors, they needed to be the bad cop to Lukashenko's good cop. In the interest of avoiding a dangerous escalation Luka was used as an ostensible (but not really) "third party" to give the leaders of the mutiny who had backed themselves into a corner a way to still get out of this with their lives so that they wouldn't fight to the death and take valuable rank and file soldiers with them.

We don't know what the terms were exactly, we'll have to wait and see, but from what has been openly stated at least there is no indication that any of the demands of the mutineers were conceded to, personnel changes were not even discussed (imo there was never a snowball's chance in hell of the government agreeing to that, can you imagine how bad it would be for discipline to allow some uppity mercs to dictate who the commanders of the armed forces are? it would be an enormous violation of the chain of command!), and the integration of Wagner into the official armed forces has only accelerated.

On the whole i think this was unavoidable at some point because the contradiction of giving so much power and prominence to a mercenary group was always going to create conflict, but the way it was handled was just about the optimal way to do it and Russia will come out of this stronger. There will be some who will say that Russia should have foreseen this and not allowed it to come this far in the first place, and maybe that is true, but maybe it was also good it happened the way it did because it offers an opportunity for a more thorough cleanse and a more decisive break with previous policy toward PMCs.

More consolidation under the official state power structures is a good thing for when communists take over again. Mercenaries with too much influence and autonomy would be a nasty problem to deal with. And at the very least the image of Wagner and especially that of certain personalities involved with it is irreversibly tarnished in the eyes of the Russian public, and again i can't say that that is bad, they were getting too full of themselves and starting to have a negative morale impact by denigrating the performance of the regular armed forces without whom they could never have even operated the way they did to begin with.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

and the integration of Wagner into the official armed forces has only accelerated.

The thing is, only those that did not take part in the march are being given the option of signing contracts with the MoD. That means there are significantly fewer Wagner troops available for Russia - the rest will presumably be going to Belarus with Prigozhin. Also, it sounds like they're still going to be PMCs, just with different contracts.