this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
13 points (88.2% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

670 readers
31 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TeezyZeezy@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Definitely not. There's literally like 600 million people in the core added together, you do not need even a tenth of them to be active revolutionaries for something like that to work.

Think about 50 million people actively erm... doing a Marxism-Leninism. There's no stopping that.

In another post, a comrade brought to my attention that just months before the revolution there were only 8,000 party members in the Bolsheviks. That should bring you relief.

[–] Skipper1402@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

How did 8 thousand got a revolution in a country of 100 million?

[–] TeezyZeezy@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Apologies, just did a reading and it said that in February of 1917 they had 24,000 members. By the October of that year they had 200,000.

Still, 24,000 is a very small number. I'm sure it had to do with the increasingly worsening material conditions and diligent party work done by the Bolsheviks.

[–] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The Bolsheviks were also not the only ones fighting. It was a broad coalition of hundreds of thousands of people. Not to mention millions of defecting soldiers.

[–] TeezyZeezy@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 10 months ago

NO NEED TO RAIN ON THE PARADE WITH A DOSE OF REALISM OKAY

Jk, I figured. But still, the fact that it was the Bolsheviks that actually were able to make it happen and seize power is inspiring