this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
541 points (98.4% liked)

News

23303 readers
5391 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

More Americans with diabetes will get a break on their insulin costs in 2024.

Sanofi is joining the nation’s two other major insulin manufacturers in offering either price caps or savings programs that lower the cost of the drugs to $35 for many patients. The three drugmakers are also drastically lowering the list prices for their products.

The moves were announced in the spring, but some didn’t take effect until January 1.

Drugmakers have come under fire for years for steeply raising the price of insulin, which is relatively inexpensive to produce. The inflation-adjusted cost of the medication has increased 24% between 2017 and 2022, and spending on insulin has tripled in the past decade to $22.3 billion in 2022, according to the American Diabetes Association.

Some 8.4 million Americans rely on insulin to survive, and as many as 1 in 4 patients have been unable to afford their medicine, leading them to ration doses – sometimes with fatal ramifications, according to the association.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

🙄

The time, effort, and resources could be handled by a public industry that produces a public good. There's no reason for it to be privatized.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It can absolutely be privatised as long as some government body handles negotiations.

Letting the private sector compete for public contracts can often reduce prices and make production more efficient. It needs to be handled well of course.

It works pretty well here. The government negotiate the prices for medication to reasonable levels and every individual has a medication price cap that gradually reduces the price for medication until they are completely free (fully subsidised). After 12 months the price cap resets and the prices go up to normal. The price cap is set at ≈230 EUR.

Apparently insulin is always free and so are some other stuff.

Obviously this only applies to prescriptions.

IMO a great system is a mix of both a strong private sector and a strong public sector with non corrupt governmental oversight.

[–] LarryTheMatador@sh.itjust.works -1 points 10 months ago

Mmmmmm. Flavorade.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub -3 points 10 months ago

non corrupt governmental oversight

I mean, we could just wish for a unicorn pony that shits glitter and barfs rainbows while we're at it.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Apparently insulin is always free and so are some other stuff.

Oh so you mean literally what I said in my original comment?

IMO a great system is a mix of both a strong private sector and a strong public sector with non corrupt governmental oversight.

IMO a great system would be to round up the executives, board members, district heads, and shareholders into work camps. 😘

[–] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Did you miss the part where I disagreed with you, lol?

You said that it has to be handled by exclusively the public sector and I said that it doesn't. And I said that here we have accomplished a great system without that.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can you not imagine the system being better than it is right now?

[–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It works great. Could you explain how it could be better? Seems like a terrible idea to just change things with no evidence that it would improve things.

The entire healthcare system could use a rework but there is nothing wrong with this system in particular.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Profit serves no function and could be removed from the system entirely. You're just scared of change because you are a conservative.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Lol, no I am not a conservative. I just want to see evidence.

A system without profit is way too fragile because of corruption.

A fully communist system won't ever work because humans are human and they suck ass.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's amazing that you seem to think for profit systems aren't corrupt lol

[–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Soviet Russia (and Russia) is very known for being extremely corrupt.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'll reiterate: it’s amazing that you seem to think for profit systems aren’t corrupt. Corruption only happens in gommunism amirite? 🙄

[–] lud@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I didn't say that. Please re-read.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -4 points 10 months ago

You are saying that government run programs are bad because of corruption, I get that. I'm telling you that this is an absurd position because you're presuming for profit systems aren't corrupt. It's ridiculous!

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes we are familiar with your barely-concealed desire to kill people. What we’re trying to discuss is more of a help-poor-people thing, than it is a hurt-rich-people thing.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub -5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

could be handled by a public industry that produces a public good

could be, in a fantasyland where all people do things out of pure altruism and always put the good of others ahead of their own self-interest.

I used to believe people could be this way too. Then I turned 8.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

If public libraries were proposed today you would oppose them as fantasyland nonsense.

In the real world, public works work.