115
Mozilla 2023 Annual Report: CEO pay skyrockets, while Firefox Marketshare nosedives
(lunduke.locals.com)
this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
115 points (68.4% liked)
Technology
59535 readers
3215 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
A significant portion of this blog post is complaining about Mozilla's repeated attempts to find new revenue streams that aren't Firefox. It's a sentiment I see a lot and I just don't get it.
They complain about Google paying to be the default search provider being a bad thing, and yet when Mozilla says "yeah, we hear ya, that's why we're trying to find stuff to diversify into so we can become less reliant on Google" people cry and shout "you should be sticking to Firefox, why aren't you focussing on Firefox??"
Like, which is it? Do you want Mozilla to diversify and have a more sustainable revenue stream, or do you want them to focus on Firefox and commit to reliance on Google? Because maintaining a project as big as Firefox without any funding simply isn't possible, and people aren't going back to paying for web browsers.
What these people want is not at all realistic. Devs want to be paid for their work. They can't have that if Mozilla follows idiots like Lunduke's "don't take money from Google, but also don't do anything that will make money. Only do Firefox."
I've yet to see a single one of these people offer any alternative that comes even remotely close to being feasible.
I'm okay with Mozilla trying to diversify their source of incomes, as long as it's focused on privacy. Firefox Relay is a great example of a paid service that helps preserving some privacy and I gladly pay for it.
I hope they'll make more privacy-focused optional services like that. If it helps paying for Firefox continued development while detaching from Google then it's a good idea.
They've got some pretty interesting stuff in the pipeline, like container tabs optionally being hooked up to their own independent Mozilla VPN connection.
IMO I think they're going to go all in eventually offering a kind of "privacy ecosystem" similar to Proton
The privacy of.... checks notes
Source: Mozilla
Good comment. I like the fact that Mozilla is branching out into Relay and VPN as subscription services. I've got to pay someone for VPN, after all, and email masking looks interesting. If the revenue from those kinds of useful subscriptions helps to sustain Firefox and it's derivatives, so much the better.
Presumably these are different people.
WTF does that have to do with bloating salaries for CEOs while devs get laid off? They're doing their damnedest to put less budget towards paying devs (for Firefox or otherwise, by the way), not more!
Mozilla's CEO is failing no matter how you look at it, including even through your own rose-colored glasses.
They get roughly as much in donations as they spend on ff dev. They get a LOT more from google, that they spend on... bs.
https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4387539/firefox-money-investigating-the-bizarre-finances-of-mozilla
Of course they spend it on more than just Firefox. What part of "we're trying to diversify" don't you understand?
And I'm sorry, Lunduke is not a trustable source. He went seriously off the deep end years ago.
From a great Linux content creator to a crazed Qanon, COVID conspiracy anti-vaxx nut trying to pedal all kinds of nonsense, who loves to shit on LGBT Linux devs. I really don't know what the hell happened to him.
It is hard to draw conclusions without knowing much facts. How much is needed and how much is got.
And i don't care about wings.
It depends what "diversify" hides.
Do you mean:
Or do you mean
Because right now, Mozilla has chosen the second route. The anti-privacy, anti-ethical route.
If Mozilla reaches the logical end state, will it even matter if they still exist? They'll be soulless corporate trash too. There won't be anything worth preserving.