Games

16681 readers

877 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

FTC lawyer confirms that Disney had a deal for an Indiana Jones game that'd be for multiple consoles. Hines confirms that the deal was amended post-acquisition to be Xbox only for consoles (twitter.com)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

This is all missing the point, this is a case against Microsoft building a monopoly in the gaming industry. It doesn't matter if Nintendo or Sony have exclusive games, if Microsoft is allowed to just keep gobbling up studios & IP, they can simply choke out the competition.

Additionally, Microsoft made a big hoopla about how they're not going to make AB games like CoD exclusive specifically to shield themselves from antitrust lawsuits, but this goes to show that behind the scenes they're going to do as much as possible to consolidate power.