this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
216 points (99.5% liked)

World News

38977 readers
3492 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Idk who taught people the incorrect definition for "exponentially different", but it does not mean "identical", "very similar" or "minutely different".

And how "different" illegal meth is from legal meth is based on its dosages and regulation, which both articles state.

So yea, you could read the articles, I just don't know if they would benefit you since your reading comprehension isn't up to snuff.

[–] alignedchaos@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

From your linked article that you don’t seem to have read beyond whatever quote you think vindicates the incorrect thing you typed:

However, Brody explains it’s essential to understand that the safety and tolerability of legalized prescription ADHD medications are miles apart compared with illegal meth.

“To emphasize this, I will compare it to the degree to which the distance to the moon dwarfs the distance to the local supermarket,” he states.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You do know that agreeing with my previous comments and article is not the slam you think it is, right?

[–] alignedchaos@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I’d say to learn to fucking read, but that’s not even the main problem with you. It’s not even the condescending smugness while being clearly wrong, though that does make you insufferable.

The real problem is how the only conversation you want to have is to undermine a valid news article for invalid reasons and to undermine the people responding with relevant lived experience, then intentionally miss the point and double down to attempt to convince yourself you didn’t say something stupid in the first place. Fuck off.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago

Yea, projecting your exact issues onto others is a valid choice.

Love how being right translates into being wrong if you don't like the science.