Not The Onion

12272 readers

1682 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

636

Hospital staff get baked potato as a 'Christmas bonus' from work (and got taxed on it) (www.indy100.com)

submitted 10 months ago by RobotToaster@mander.xyz to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

83 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/9823286

‘Tis the season to celebrate our loved ones, and also for employers to show how much they care.

Whether by throwing a Christmas bash or handing out extra cash, businesses around the world are broadly expected to offer their dedicated staff a festive token of their appreciation.

And who deserves more recognition than the workers who keep our healthcare systems afloat?

Yet, the senior management team at one hospital apparently decided that rather than boost their staff’s pay or treat them to a slap-up meal, they would provide them with…

Potatoes.

The questionable move was broadcast to social media by an X/Twitter user who calls herself Amanda B.

She explained dejectedly: “My work is doing a potato bar as our Christmas bonus. I’m literally getting a hospital potato as a bonus.”

She then added: “They also said it has a $15 (£11.85) value so it will be taxed on our next check. Does anyone need an assistant so I can just quit right now?”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Labrad0r@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I obviously don't know the specifics of the situation, but DNR on its own doesn't mean "stop providing medical care". The stat tests were probably to ensure grandpa didn't get to the point of needing resuscitation.

Edit: And I don't mean for this to be combative, it's just that goals of care/end of life planning conversations are hard enough for the patient, family, and care team. It's even worse when people think that DNR means "I'm giving up on my myself/mom/dad/grandparent/etc". Resuscitation is a pretty traumatic experience, and the person may not want to go through that if the chance of them having a good quality of life afterwards is low. Everything else can still be available to them if that's what they want.