this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
476 points (94.4% liked)
Technology
59590 readers
5274 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah, that's exactly what I meant. But some people choose to live without it, or mostly without it, and live very fine lives. Additionally, one might lose internet for some period of time, but that would definitely not be life threatening, the same way losing access to food, clean water, clothes, etc.
No doubt that it's necessary to be a part of a modern society, though.
It's fair to say that losing internet access doesn't cause you physical harm and won't cause illness or death. In most cases (it's pretty vital for hospitals, for example)
However, i dont believe those criteria should be the only ones used to deem something a necessity or even a basic human right.
It has become almost ubiquitous in the modern world and is almost a barrier for entry for a prosperous life.
It might not be necessary directly to sustaining a human life but it is, at least, indirectly. And at most it is directly necessary for a prosperous one.