this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
119 points (84.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35696 readers
1334 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

All the ingredients are there and it won't take much to put it all together.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] drahardja@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

The armaments held by private citizens are laughable in the face of the weapons in the Military.

Any “civil war” in the US would likely be in the form of constant terrorism, not all-out gunfights.

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Once the government actually starts cracking down on the domestic terrorists, they have no chance. With all the surveillance they've been doing since 9/11 they're bound to know exactly who to arrest.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Case in point, in only a few years they’ve prosecuted hundreds of people who broke into the Capitol building. They can certainly find you.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They still haven't found the guy that was leaving pipe bombs around on 1/6 have they? I hear what you're saying, but most capitol rioters got caught because they were fucking idiots.

[–] idiomaddict@feddit.de 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think that level of idiocy would still hold true for the people who start a civil war.

[–] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah, dumbasses would be live streaming placing their IEDs

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The exception doesn’t disprove the rule

[–] PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The small flat blade screwdriver in the front pocket of a mechanic is the most terrifying weapon on the planet.

[–] ArumiOrnaught@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'd never sully my pocket prybar like that. I have a 24" adjustable wrench that is perfect for swinging.

[–] PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I will swap the pins on your fuel pump connector while you sleep.

[–] ArumiOrnaught@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Plz no. There is no alldata for the vehicles I work on :(

[–] PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

sticks pebble in your valve stem cap

[–] nomecks@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

What makes you think the armed forces won't split in a civil war?

[–] Bizarroland@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Chain of command.

The military is very good about making sure that the people that participate in it adhere to the rules they are given.

People that step out of line will be dealt with abruptly and brutally. I'm not saying there won't be dissension in the ranks, but I am saying that the number of military people that will split with their command structure is going to be minuscule and easily dealt with.

[–] ReCursing@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You just need a couple of generals to say "no my orders are legitimate, theirs aren't, mine come for the real president!" and you have a problem. And all that takes it a little bit of blackmail and bribery or a couple of high ranking useful idiots or psychopathic grifters

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Theoretically yes. But if you want to know the climate of senior officers you need look no further than the Joint Chiefs actually yelling at Trump in his office and disseminating memos on exactly what the military oath says. (Loyalty to the Constitution)

They aren't likely to turn anytime soon.

[–] nomecks@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I disagree. That's all well and good when it's a common enemy, but when you're ordered to attack your family and friends who live in NY, that's a different ball game.

[–] Bizarroland@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The military allows you to disobey orders that you find unconscionable.

That's part of our whole don't commit war crimes thing

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

But you do realize they're going to shoot you. If they're actually ordering illegal things there going to shoot people who don't obey the orders too. That's a hard decision for a teenager to make.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

No it doesn't. It requires you to disobey orders that are unlawful.

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago

I don't know much about such things but I wonder whether it's possible in any meaningful way.

If there's a split they don't just divvy up the toys and have at it.

One side might have a few things on wheels and tracks, but can they call in an air strike? Will they even have GPS?

[–] Brawndo@kbin.social -1 points 10 months ago

If there was a true civil war the military would probably be divided with some on one side and some on the other but I really doubt there will be a civil war any time in the near future.