this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
934 points (98.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

32380 readers
425 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Though calling them "cross platform" when all you're doing is opening a website in a browser is IMO a bit rich. Is lemmy cross-platform, too?

If at least they had native UI elements on each platform, we'd be getting somewhere. Fitting design and all.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's not just "opening a website in a browser". The UI itself is displayed in a WebView, but Electron (and Tauri etc.) also have code running outside the WebView which interfaces with native APIs etc. Just for a simple example - a normal browser application couldn't open a file on your drive before without showing a dialog (and it still can't without getting permission first), which Electron etc. can.

And this code is absolutely cross-platform. So how is it rich to call an application with a cross-platform UI and cross-platform functionality "cross-platform"?

[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Would you prefer new terminology? Like platform-neutral UI? The way I see it there's CLI, GUI, and WebUI. When discussing platforms for the first two, were discussing the OS, but for the last the platform is the browser.

I honestly don't care what the user interface is as long it's efficient at getting done what I need it to do.