this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
1061 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

58070 readers
5153 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 79 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Knusper@feddit.de -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The thing is, I really don't think, Google would care about Firefox. Firefox is sitting at negligible percentages of usage share. The only real competitor to Chrome is Safari and that's because of iOS.
I guess, they might impact Safari on macOS with this, but someone would have to try this out to actually see, and ultimately, this could still just be a dumb mistake.

Having said that, Google holds a near-monopoly in both video content and web browsers. They have a special duty to not disadvantage competitors and even if this was an honest mistake, I do think, it deserves a slap on the wrist.

[–] SandroHc@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How much of Firefox's dwindling market share do you think was caused by Google's, Microsoft's and Apple's anticompetitive practices?

[–] Knusper@feddit.de 3 points 9 months ago
[–] JonEFive@midwest.social 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Google has a history of this sort of "whoops, we got caught, uhhh... That was just a bug!" behavior.

[–] Knusper@feddit.de 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They do have a history of such things happening, yes, which is why my comment exists in the first place. Normally, I would assume this to just be the result of regular shitty management practices paired with regular shitty profit motives.

The history makes it look like they might genuinely have a higher motive here, and I'm saying I still don't think so, because it would be far too petty and I don't see them benefitting that much from it.

[–] JonEFive@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago

I want to believe you and I hope you're right, but I have such little faith in corporations ever doing the right thing anymore.