this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
1570 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

59261 readers
3008 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The ability to change features, prices, and availability of things you've already paid for is a powerful temptation to corporations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] greenmarty@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Some people would call it counterfeiting but we won't do that , right ?

[–] amzd@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Depends on the intention. Most “illegal” copies are distributed for free so that’s not counterfeiting (there’s no intention to deceive or defraud)

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's probably going into semantics and what the law says, it's different for every country.

What's happening with games and softwares are cracks and repacking, it's manipulating few parts of the original product to provide partial or sometimes full functionality. This is an infringement of intellectual property and not a counterfeit.

For podcasts, music and movies it's usually a rip, out of vinyls, lossless or a high definition source. These are copies, not manipulated in any way.

Maybe camrips are truly a counterfeit.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

... This is an infringement of intellectual property ...

Not unless it's distributed.

Copying copyrighted works is not a crime. Distributing those copies is a crime.

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Copyright doesn't explicitly say anything about distribution. Distribution is usually used to determine the scale of the crime and calculating incurred damages.

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 11 months ago

Yea there might be an intent to make profit or resell in there

[–] greenmarty@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I have yet to see country that doesn't mind copying their currency unofficially but I'm open to suggestions 🫡

[–] amzd@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Correct, that would be counterfeiting if you would copy money with the intention to deceive or defraud others. That doesn’t contradict what I said.

[–] greenmarty@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

IMHO it does contradict what you say. Intention doesn't matter. If you copy currency , you either have to make apparent its fake currency or you are might get in trouble with law. Intention, aka motive is hard to prove and if proven doesn't make it legal to copy official currency.