this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
449 points (89.5% liked)

Technology

59346 readers
7412 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 75 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Is this news? This is expected, it's what they did with 7 and XP after those reached full EOL, which happened on the day they said it would for 7 at the time 7 launched, and a few years after the date they said when XP launched.

The 2025 date has been known since 2015 when 10 launched and is the standard Microsoft ten year support cycle for operating systems.

And yet, in spite of this, every single time the tech media published these breathless and shocked articles about how horrible it is that Microsoft is suddenly dropping support for their ten year old systems.

These articles are like clockwork. I'd say we'll be getting them for Windows 11 in about seven or eight years, but they have a new "modern" lifestyle they've adopted for it that's more based on last major update release or something and it'll probably come sooner than that this time around.

[–] Broax@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Although I generally agree with the sentiment the problem here is that most computers can't be upgraded to windows 11 and that pretty much never happened before.

[–] OfficerBribe@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Doubt that most cannot run W11. Unless you have a CPU before 2018 you should have TPM 2.0 and if you do not, you can bypass that requirement with 1 reg value. This officiall bypass still requires TPM 1.2, but most probably have it.

[–] sonovebitch@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I'm still rocking an i7-4790K from 2016 with a 3070Ti and 32GB DDR3. While I know my rig is due a refresh, there isn't a game or VR game or program I've thrown at it that it can't handle properly.

But I can't upgrade to Win11 because no TPM 2.0. And I don't have 1000$ to throw in a new mobo + gen 12/13/14 CPU + DDR5 + M.2.

[–] OfficerBribe@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Googled a bit, not 100% sure but seems that CPU does not seem to have TPM at all so kind of out of luck. Motherboard does not have it either? In theory you could add it, no idea about cost.

Have never tested, but I remember there being methods to install W11 to any HW. No idea if afterwards everything works as expected, maybe give it a read and test in VM first.

[–] Rainman@feddit.de 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Generally I would agree with you, as the 10 year lifecycle you described is what's to be expected. With Windows 10 however, Microsoft said on release it would be the last Windows and they move to windows-as-a-service. So Windows 10 not being the last Windows and the upgrade path being closed by default for many older PCs is newsworthy.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 months ago

Microsoft never said that, though. One person said that and tech media ran with it like it was gospel (and Microsoft didn't correct it, which is absolutely their fault, but still, that was never an official statement but apparently something that was just poorly phrased)