this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
710 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19089 readers
5677 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

TheGuardian.com

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 71 points 11 months ago (4 children)

YEAH!

WE DID IT AMERICA!

U.S.A! U.S.A.! U.S.A!

All these senseless murders every fucking year, and not one of them directed at the republicans that have ruined everything.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago (4 children)

It's conservatives doing the shootings. Why does it seem that 95% of all mass shooters have a white supremacist manifesto?

[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

Because white supremacists' arguments are easily dismantled to their core components of idiocy, racism and ignorance. They can't convince anyone who isn't a moron racist and they believe that those who don't think like they do are trying to replace them so they resort to mass murder. Because they are racist morons.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org -5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Media bias.

Seriously, when talking about this people use different definitions of "mass shooting" depending on what fits their agenda.

If we're talking about the "nutter shoots up a public place" type shootings, then those caused about 1400 deaths between the middle of 1964 and the middle of 2021 based on numbers posted by WaPo.

If you define it as "any shooting with more than three dead" then the numbers go way up but a huge chunk of that is gang violence and family annihilators (people who murder-suicide their family). These are different kinds of problems that need to be treated differently. And neither of those is going to respond much to gun control laws.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

different definitions of “mass shooting”

The definition by the FBI is the only one I've seen. What number works for you?

[–] Haywire@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

You had me until your last sentence.

[–] TheKingBee@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Hey it happened once. He couldn't shoot for shit, but someone tried...

[–] linuxdweeb@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This feels fucked up to write, but incels shooting women/children/non-whites is probably better than having lefties/righties shooting each other. That's how you actually get a civil war.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah.

Lets let the perpetrators encouraging mass shootings continue to get off scott free while actively enraging their base with falsehoods.

That'll totally prevent a civil war.

[–] linuxdweeb@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Lets let the perpetrators encouraging mass shootings continue to get off scott free while actively enraging their base with falsehoods.

Is there a /c/insanepeoplelemmy yet?