Privacy

1229 readers

61 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

danielintempesta@programming.dev

166

Judge: Amazon “cannot claim shock” that bathroom spycams were used as advertised (arstechnica.com)

submitted 11 months ago by flumph@programming.dev to c/privacy@programming.dev

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Tech legal expert Eric Goldman wrote that a victory for the plaintiff could be considered "a dangerous ruling for the spy cam industry and for Amazon," because "the court’s analysis could indicate that all surreptitious hook cameras are categorically illegal to sell." That could prevent completely legal uses of cameras designed to look like clothes hooks, Goldman wrote, such as hypothetical in-home surveillance uses.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] thenightisdark@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

https://youtu.be/PshDKbs69BM?si=H0Fc9Kq5XRq2-4Cr

Apparently that video evidence there is fake no one's ever thought to spray paint the camera - if you could tell it's a camera.

It's almost as if and heavy sarcasm here humans know how cameras work. 🤣🤣🤣

Can you find the TV trope of infiltrator or burglar sees camera and shoots it or spray paints over it.... 🤣