Privacy

1101 readers

1 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

danielintempesta@programming.dev

166

Judge: Amazon “cannot claim shock” that bathroom spycams were used as advertised (arstechnica.com)

submitted 10 months ago by flumph@programming.dev to c/privacy@programming.dev

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Tech legal expert Eric Goldman wrote that a victory for the plaintiff could be considered "a dangerous ruling for the spy cam industry and for Amazon," because "the court’s analysis could indicate that all surreptitious hook cameras are categorically illegal to sell." That could prevent completely legal uses of cameras designed to look like clothes hooks, Goldman wrote, such as hypothetical in-home surveillance uses.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's not about being stupid, it's about not caring. Any punishment will be tiny compared to the profit made.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That would apply to listing it in the first place, they’re still morons for thinking they could claim innocence about it in court.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Again, modern strategy for corporations in lawsuits is to delay, delay, delay. The purpose is to continue drawing things out as long as possible. They knew full well it would fail. But it's a delay.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Cool story, they’re still morons who likely did think they would get away with it.

Honestly, I don’t know why some of you act like you’re the only ones who understand corporate legal strategy.