OpenStreetMap community

4169 readers

4 users here now

Everything #OpenStreetMap related is welcome: software releases, showing of your work, questions about how to tag something, as long as it has to do with OpenStreetMap or OpenStreetMap-related software.

OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.

Join OpenStreetMap and start mapping: https://www.openstreetmap.org/.

There are many communication channels about OSM, many organized around a certain country or region. Discover them on https://openstreetmap.community/

https://mapcomplete.org/ is an easy-to-use website to view, edit and add points (such as shops, restaurants and others)

https://learnosm.org/en/ has a lot of information for beginners too.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

Ben_on_Lemmy@lemmy.ml

Conventions for House Addresses (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by beppi@sh.itjust.works to c/openstreetmap@lemmy.ml

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hey guys, I know this question is probably answered somewhere on the internet but I just can't seem to find it.

In OSM, I have an address, and on that block of land I have many separate small houses, each with the same house number, but different unit/flat numbers. I could assign housenumber 123 to each but from what I understand, duplicating information is bad.

Is it a good idea to instead omit this information from each house, and draw an area around the entire block with addr tags on that specifying housenumber, suburb, street etc. and each actual house only has unit number and building type?

Thanks guys

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Krzyzwen@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

I would indeed add addr:housenumber= to each unit, there is also addr:unit= which I would prefer over constructions like "addr:housnumber=123/4". Drawing a polygon around the lot for the housenumber sounds usable, for which I would use the residential that should already be there but, preferred method for that (afaik) is a singular address node.

There is probably a section in the wiki that describes, or at least proposes, a setup for precisely this use case.