this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
369 points (97.9% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Not sure where you get vitriol and the idea anything is fair. I am also not extra happy Scotland did not leave the UK but as there was a vote (just 2 years too soon) and last time I checked things still work that way so I like most people have to live with it.

Hold a referendum on the issue then again (I am sure it will also be a mess). Its insane that people now think you can somehow ignore a majority vote because you don't like the result. Was this a bad idea? yes. Is the UK filled with "a bunch of idiot yokels and old people"? also yes.

[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Its insane that people now think you can somehow ignore a majority vote because you don’t like the result.

Making a bad decision doesn't mean you can never, ever rethink that decision and have to stick with it no matter what.

If the majority doesn't like the result, then what's the point of not reconsidering things?

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 11 months ago

Never said otherwise. But retroactively arguing the issue without a new referendum is an issue.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It was barely a majority vote and anyway it wasn't legally binding so the government could have totally ignored it at the time and been fine the vote was utterly pointless.

The problem is the morons held the vote then decided to uphold the decision of the vote even though It was essentially only getting soundings.

It was a trade relationship why was it a matter of public consultation?

The people of the UK have been extremely hurt by this and it's just irritating to see that apparently there would be resistance in the EU to fixing a mistake. Why is there resistance I don't get it?

[–] ebikefolder@feddit.de 11 points 11 months ago

Why is there resistance I don’t get it?

The history of British whining and cherrypicking. They never behaved like regular members, but more like "special snowflakes". I understand the fear that they might start this nonsense again, once back in the the union.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 11 months ago

It was barely a majority vote and anyway it wasn’t legally binding so the government could have totally ignored it

The problem is the morons held the vote then decided to uphold the decision of the vote

Do you see the problem with this approach?