this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
408 points (100.0% liked)

196

16460 readers
2107 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Wikipedia has a bias, don't fool yourself.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 18 points 11 months ago

Don't fool myself about what?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Yes, exactly. Anything perceived as "neutral" or "nonbiased" is just your bias being reflected.

[–] mishkkaz@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

The specific methods that Wikipedia uses to determine whether a source is reliable causes it to have a status quo bias towards capitalist neoliberalism. There's also a bit of consent manufacturing that occurs on sources and controversial topics.

Don't get me wrong, Wikipedia is great in most situations. However when it comes to controversial (especially political) topics, look elsewhere.