this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
533 points (100.0% liked)

196

16484 readers
1853 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Loki@feddit.de 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Generated from scratch? How do you think AI generates images? They need to be trained on images to produce anything coherent, there is no "generated from scratch" with AI (well, DL like stable diffusion)

[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Do you think humans create art in a vacuum? They dont, they use all the art they have ever seen or grown up around for inspiration. Do you owe Disney a cut because their movies as a child inspired you to get into art?

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And how humans understand things is same as feeding pixels to a program?

Give some credit to your brain.

[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

LLM's arent a 1-1 comparison to human learning, but they are the closest we have gotten yet. These programs are capable of learning and storing lessons from previous sets of instructions that are no longer currently being provided. Its not completely ridiculous to compare that to how humans learn

[–] Loki@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't, and I never said that. I was replying to your assertion that it isn't stealing if it's generated from scratch. Your assumption that AI (DL) generates from scratch is simply wrong.

[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Well I've watched them get made by scratch multiple times, and when I first started making gens I'd reverse google search them to see if they were too close to anything existing previously and they never were, so, I'm gonna need more proof than anyone who's claimed it was plagiarism has been willing to provide has given so far