this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
417 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59346 readers
7412 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stom@lemmy.world 378 points 11 months ago (10 children)

This is why I use Linux, the fingerprint device wouldn't be supported so this wouldn't be an issue /s

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 127 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Mmm yes security by non-functionality. A pillar of the modern cybersecurity framework.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 81 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And this is why I am typing this on a 1921 Royal No. 10 typewriter.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Found Tom Hanks's Lemmy account.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 26 points 11 months ago

Works for my webcam. Tbh I'd like someone to hack it, would mean they would've written drivers for it

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The fun thing about Linux is your realize physical control is ownership. You can just throw a Bootable Linux image with some utilities and remove the password from a Windows account in a second. If you really need to keep something safe, it has to be encrypted.

[–] kadu@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

remove the password from a Windows account

That used to be true, but no longer works

[–] jonne@infosec.pub -4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Regardless, you can just read what's on the disk anyway, so you don't need to be able to log in.

[–] randombullet@feddit.de -5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Unless bitlocker is enabled by default, which is becoming more and more common unfortunately...

[–] Hubi@feddit.de 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The one on my Thinkpad works just fine :)

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I got a T80s and the sensor doesn't work. It's an 8th gen Intel machine, that's like four or five generations behind.

[–] Hubi@feddit.de 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I've got a T440p and I just set it up through the menu in the KDE settings, it worked right out of the box.

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Mine's not in libfprint, libfprint-tod, or libfprint-goodix. Running GNOME because I heard fprintd was easier to implement instead of KDE, which is usually my pref DE.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nah I use fprint on my arch laptop so there is fingerprint login technology. Hopefully that doesn't have security vulnerabilities.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It has vulnerabilities for sure. But they haven’t been found because no one cares about hacking you or the 1 other person on earth that use Arch and fingerprint security.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Security by obscurity lol

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago

That's funny, on my XPS Windows crashed when I tried adding a fingerprint. Works flawlessly under Arch.

[–] RFBurns@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Correct answer.

Using any form of biometric 'login' under the US's "justice" system is supremely ill-advised.

[–] PeWu@lemmy.ml 9 points 11 months ago

Today I was fucking around with this shit. I can't even update my distro, otherwise ecryptfs will go adios, and fingerprinting will be broken.

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

One of the major reasons I gave up on trying to run Linux on my laptop was lack of fingerprint reader support.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

That would be a plus for me, actually. I never liked fingerprint authentication.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

So YES, from someone who was asked to do fingerprint authentication in a sensitive environment (and had to refuse, even to the salespeople pested me)

[–] robotica@lemmy.world -4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

How is not having support for something a plus for you? I swear to god, some Linux users are so stuck up.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Where to start....

My dumb TV doesn't support smart features. A plus.

My coffee maker doesn't support wifi. A plus.

My games don't support in-app purchases. A plus.

My windows 10 laptop (did you read that?! Whaaat, I'm not a Linux user???!!!) doesn't support Windows 11. Major plus.

My MacBook's OS version (no way!!!) doesn't support unnecessary FaceTime features. A plus.

[–] gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

fingerprint login is not secure. period. Being stuck in using a password login is a plus

[–] ultra@feddit.ro 1 points 11 months ago

You could just disable fingerprint login, though.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 11 months ago

"what, you dont want to use the new door lock made from soggy white bread? You deadbolt losers are so stuck up"

[–] WindowsEnjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

wouldn't be supported so this wouldn't be an issue

I did not expect that 😅

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

I have a Microsoft fingerprint reader that works fine on Linux lol