this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
515 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

35066 readers
457 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] madis@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, it blocks ads, and likely the YouTube ones too. The current problem with YouTube is just their anti-adblocker which needs very frequent filter updates and unlike MV2, filter updates in MV3 need the update of the entire extension (think approval periods etc).

[–] ExLisper@linux.community -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That was my understanding. People talk about this change like it's going to disable adblock extensions completely which is clearly not the case. So far no one really explained what the actual impact will be. Do you know that? I see youtube ads might be harder to block. Anything else?

[–] mihor@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I would like to know that as well.

Although if updating the adblocker's list is not instant, as with wm2, it is basically a losing race with Google, since they can change the ad domains even before the adblocker update is applied.

Or worse, since the adblocker no longer has direct access, they can just set chrome to ignore it's requests/changes when it benefits them.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Oh fear not, limiting filter list updates to addon updates is a huge problem. For those users who rarely restart their browsers it's even bigger of a problem: updating the addon (for the up to date filter lists) also means that all of the already loaded websites will lose the filters until you reload them, which is both not obvious to be needed and very painful, when you are using your browser for other things than consuming.

Also, does that also mean that custom filter lists are impossible anymore?

Besides these, also take into account that approval of addon updates can take a long time, quite often days, while the filters need to be updated more often (once or twice a day) for websites to not break for the majority of the users.

Yes, thinking about it, I still confidently think that chrome's changes are unacceptable and are dealbreakers, and google is very clearly trying to curb content blockers with whatever tools available. Fortunately I don't have to use that garbage anywhere.