this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
137 points (96.0% liked)

Games

16658 readers
591 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
137
Bigger Than Godzilla: Why Are Games Using So Many Gigabytes? (www.techspot.com)
submitted 11 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

All of those are in good faith. A part of it is in bad faith as well though. Studios forgoing or at least deprioritizing optimalisation. Why waste weeks on Q&A when you can just yawn and tell consumers to upgrade if it doesn't affect your bottom line?

Case in point: COD MWIII All of the internet is (rightly) shitting on it but Activision won't care because they'll likely still sell several million copies. What incentive does that give them to NOT fire entire Q&A departments and pocket those cost savings on top of the profits?

[–] PixxlMan@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

If the game is huge enough no one will have space to play anything else...

[–] Aux@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

QA what? You can't QA and optimise huge ass textures to fit into a gig. I can tell you a story about high res images. My partner is a photographer. She did a commissioned project of 7 collage photos to be printed in large scale. She bought a 512 gig drive to work on a project. These 7 photos took 95% of the space of this drive in the end. Yeah, 500 gigs for 7 bloody photos!

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

But how big were the photos? That would be 70Gb per photo.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

They are collages, meaning that each PSD file contains multiple super high res photos. But the end result is just 7 huge pictures on the wall.

As for the final pixel size, I don't remember now, but they're over 100mpx of 32 bit per channel of image data (that's 16 bytes per each pixel instead of regular 4).