this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
114 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19159 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 78 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Okay, I had heard most of the rest of the GOP's moronic plans, but telework restrictions? From the article, the telework part:

If Republicans are able to pass their FSGG bill, it would require federal employees to work in the office at least as much as they did before the COVID-19 pandemic. “Instead of ‘leading by example’ in the construction of sustainable buildings, [the General Services Administration] should lead by example by bringing their employees back to the office, like the private sector,” Rep. Steve Womack, R-Ark., the bill’s author, said on the House floor on Wednesday. “We must hold the federal workforce accountable for the quality of their work and the service they provide to the American people.”

Is there any evidence that telework reduces the quality of the work? How does the GOP consistently empower the dumbest people?

[–] vinylshrapnel@lemmynsfw.com 56 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Seems like a dog whistle for commercial real estate invested donors.

[–] RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

We just say Crapitalism.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 42 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Is there any evidence that telework reduces the quality of the work?

No, no there is not.

Edit: I've been working from home ever since the pandemic started, and my performance has never suffered.

[–] rthmchgs@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 11 months ago

You and me, both, man.

[–] duckCityComplex@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I would think it would also increase costs on the agency.

This is pure old-person "butts in seats == productivity" mentality.

[–] DontMakeMoreBabies@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The amount of time people spend socializing in my office about non work is just batshit insane. It seems like an hour or two every day for a good number of folks is just 'social monkey time.'

I've learned to chit chat and play the game because otherwise you have issues but goddamn it's an unnecessary time sink that must impact productivity.

[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

If WFH got rid of morale teams and other weird white collar bullshit we'd all be living better.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I will argue that office work provides some advantages over WFH. I do NOT think those advantages outweigh the benefits of WFH, but pretending those advantages don't exist is simply false.

One example; I'm in the office for whatever reason, and there were a couple of others from different teams there.

Shooting the bull with the tech support manager led me to understand a few things I didn't know or wildly misunderstood.

Sitting at my desk and one tech starts talking to another about $project. "Hold up guys! This is something my team has been questioning or misunderstanding!" Turns out, they were misunderstanding our take as well.

And of course there's much to be said about team building and camaraderie. I've if got 2 people wanting 2 things of equal priority from me, I'm helping the person I know first. It's just human nature.

Having said all that, other tech firms would poach 2/3rds of our staff if we mandated a return to office. Also, we've saved a pile of money, both for the company and personally.

[–] divineslayer@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

For me, the only thing I’m really missing is white boarding. I have yet to find an online white boarding tool that can get close to the real deal.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago

First, they hate Federal employees on general principles. Not only are most government employees unionized, if they actually do their jobs they undermine the idea that private industry is always the better option. Next, construction companies are big donors, so they want more government buildings. And yes, more buildings and few employees seems like a dumb idea, but hey, banning Roe v. Wade has incresed abortions and no GOP is talking about that!

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

What a fucking joke.