Asklemmy

43516 readers

1329 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What are some cool things to do with ChatGPT? (lemm.ee)

submitted 10 months ago by GreyTechnician@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

138 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What its opinion on AI art is.

If it implies it supports AI art, interview it on why it does given it was made with humanity in mind.

If it implies it opposes AI art, interview it on why it does given ChatGPT is an AI.

[–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It tends to both-sides issues like that. Here’s its initial response as an example:

AI-generated art is a fascinating and rapidly evolving field. It has the potential to democratize artistic expression, enabling those without traditional artistic skills to create visually compelling works. This technology can also serve as a tool for professional artists, offering new possibilities in digital art and design.

However, it also raises important ethical and creative questions. Issues like originality, copyright, and the impact on traditional artists' livelihoods are significant concerns. The line between inspiration and appropriation can become blurred when AI systems are trained on existing artworks.

In essence, AI art represents both a remarkable technological achievement and a complex cultural phenomenon, with its benefits and challenges continually evolving as the technology advances.

I think since it “views” the technology as being best applied as assistance neither of your followups super apply. If you disagree OR agree I’m happy to ask it whatever followup you’d like me to.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In that case, it's fine. I'm surprised nobody exploits it.

[–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Ooh that's a neat fact. I wonder how much training it would take for it to be able to make those images. I'm not sure the available models are capable of that right now. They have trouble with English text and I'm sure that they're trained mostly on that. There's an added wrinkle to Arabic in that GPT writes from left to right. From my understanding models like BERT, ROBERTA and BART don't have that issue as readily, since they "read" bi-directionally. Pi does, as well. I don't know enough about the back-end of DALLE 3 to know if it would naturally have extra issues with Arabic but my suspicion is that it would not, as I imagine it uses a diffusion model, which works by refining random noise.