Asklemmy

43399 readers

1053 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Do you think the fediverse has become a save space for radicals? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 3 years ago by vis4valentine@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

67 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The alt social media are a good place to run away from algorithms and explicit mass manipulation from other big tech, be more free, independent, and spread ideas, but I also think that the fediverse is being filling with people with radical political ideologies, some kicked out of traditional social platforms for this same reason. I'm not saying that we can't have discussions, but I think that many people are making their own echo Chambers in the fediverse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] pinknoise@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 years ago

In a democracy you also put up with right, extreme and or stupid people

Personal freedom stops where everybody elses freedom begins. Extremists don't have a place in a (modern) democracy as soon as they try to hurt other peoples freedom that doesn't infringe on theirs in any way. Same sex marriage opposition, racial segregation, anti-secularism, etc. are not to be "put up" with. They are not democratic in any way shape or form, even if they claim to be and even if they are in the majority.

But it's probably alarming that alternative platforms could be associated with those people.

For some reason fediverse stuff (esp mastodon) has in-your-face branding that can only be replaced by editing templates. So instances are automatically associated with the project. Nobody would associate a specific forum software with an instance of it because they usually restrict the branding to the footer and let admins edit the theme from the control panel at least a little bit.