this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
874 points (83.3% liked)

Memes

45151 readers
1871 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] praise_idleness@sh.itjust.works 84 points 10 months ago (53 children)

A communist nation that can really provide all that is as realistic as capitalistic utopia.

[–] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Not a tankie, but the USSR had mostly solved this problem, despite all its other issues. There did exist some homelessness, but nowhere near the extent of current USA.

[–] pelya@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Sure, you could get a piece of land in Siberian tundra at any time, I would not call that housing.

Moving to a city was way more complicated than in capitalist US. You could not simply buy an apartment. You had to be allocated an apartment by the government. And you needed connections for that. Or bribes. Ideally both. If you think your local rabid Republicans do not care for little wage slave men, you never experienced USSR, it was like that but 100x worse.

[–] Stalins_Spoon@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 10 months ago

If you got a new job in a different city, they gave you a new flat, at least in Romania

[–] Starglasses@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Seems like you have to have strong connections through networking. Sounds familiar.

[–] pelya@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yup. And networking would inevitably involve vodka. All major decisions would eventually involve vodka in USSR.

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago (7 children)

One of Stalin's failures almost any tankie won't deny.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Mercival@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago

Well, I'm from a post-USSR country and a substantial part of this was the criminalization of homelessness. Can't have homeless people, if you lock them up (be it in a prison or asylum).

Then again, just about anyone, who did not conform to the party's message got locked up. Getting your place bugged at the slightest hint you might be up to something disagreeable and all that good stuff. The secret police could disappear and or beat you up without any real justification.

I hate late-stage capitalism as much as you, but coming from a country that's been through this, I am extremely reluctant to give the rotten and frankly repugnant USSR regime any credit.

[–] onion@feddit.de 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

In what communist country was housing a problem?

[–] SloganLessons@kbin.social 44 points 10 months ago (4 children)

This is a trick question, the real answer is that there weren’t real communist countries

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] praise_idleness@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago

I mean even in the case of USSR they had to wait for more than a decade to actually get a livable apartment, not to mention severe lack of infrastructure...

But of course, better than people just kicked out to the streets. But then again, less is not none. The housing situation definitely didn't do USSR's overall economic status any favor.

People at least had somewhere to go

that's just moving the goal post, isn't it?

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Soviet Union? It was uncommon for a family of 6 to live in a small apartment. You can even see it in old soviet movies where apartments would be separated by curtains (common comedy trope).

[–] probablyaCat@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure there were extra houses after all those people that starved to death.

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

In Communist countries people starve to death because of famine, in Capitalist countries people also strave to death because of famine while still starving to death after famines are over because they cant afford groceries.

load more comments (51 replies)