this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
352 points (98.6% liked)

Privacy

31991 readers
871 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/5707453

The Chrome team says they're not going to pursue Web Integrity but...

it is piloting a new Android WebView Media Integrity API that’s “narrowly scoped, and only targets WebViews embedded in apps.”

They say its because the team "heard your feedback." I'm sure that's true, and I can wildly speculate that all the current anti-trust attention was a factor too.

Many said we couldn’t stop it. We, like many, applied pressure, and they backed the fuck off.

We have no room for complacency now though. Google cannot be allowed to dictate web standards. Firefox needs to eat into that Chromium market share.

Never forgive. Never forget.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

wow, they are not completely beyond redemption, it seems

[–] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They moved too quickly and the backlash was too intense. They will 100% try to push this shit again as soon as they think the market/userbase might bear it.

[–] scetron@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

100% they will try again, they’ll just be a bit more quiet about, maybe do it once integrity feature at a time.

[–] jwagner7813@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

They have a shit ton of work to do. This does not redeem them at all...

This feels a lot like astroturfing/pandering/propaganda. I've seen this article posted a ton in the last 24 hours...

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They moved too fast, and got negative response and backed off on panic. They will rebrand, and try this again but slower. If you care about freedom, start using Firefox or another gecko based browser.

They got cocky, because chrome currently dominates browser market share.

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Companies do this on purpose now. Piss people off, slightly roll things back. People will be less angry when they do the exact same thing again.

I don't believe for one second they didn't plan on rolling this back before announcing it.

[–] pragmakist@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

And because their main competitor depends on them financially.

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Redemption implies there was a character to redeem.

It's a business, and it's business is intricately locked into goals that match what Web Integrity API stood for. It may be gone now but everyone needs to watch twice as hard. They'll just try to ease people into the idea more carefully.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

people make decisions, not businesses

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

The number of people involved in the decisions of companies: many of which do not have any actual reason to care about the livelihood, reputation, or ethics of said company...should make it fairly clear that you cannot assume or perceive a company in the same way you do a person.

Most of that's just lobbying PR anyway to give companies more leverage against...well...people