this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
49 points (93.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8256 readers
891 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Is important to have options from a moral compass such as only EA CEO's can be.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I don’t see them being anti-consumer until they buy Nintendo

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nintendo is perhaps the most anti-consumer major gaming company, followed by Sony and then Microsoft. All things considered, Microsoft ownership is the better of the three for consumers, but that doesn't mean every decision Microsoft makes is good for consumers.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It’s that if they started walling things off now then buying Nintendo would never be approved

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nintendo would never sell to them anyways. Nintendo executives are so stubborn they'd dissolve the whole company before selling out to Microsoft or Sony, though if they ever were to sell they'd be far more likely to sell to Microsoft than Sony.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Doesn’t really matter when Microsoft has stated that as a goal

https://www.theverge.com/2023/9/19/23880146/phil-spencer-microsoft-xbox-acquiring-nintendo#

So if they are working towards that then logically they would work towards that

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Any company would say that. Literally any company would acquire one of their major competitors if the opportunity arose. The same thing can be said that Sony would also purchase Nintendo if they could afford to do so. This doesn't mean Microsoft is actively trying to buy them.

Microsoft previously tried to purchase Nintendo already, or they offered some kind of collaboration deal in the early 2000s, and Nintendo declined. Nintendo will always decline sale.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So at which point is it too late in your eyes? When the ball is rolling or when it's already plowed into a car and caused a 15-car pile-up?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I’d say it was too late decades ago

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And yet we could stop the ball from rolling at some point...

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Do you mean idealistically or do you think that politicians are above accepting any amount of money they can offer

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

Definitely idealistically. Realistically, this world never stops sucking.