this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
130 points (97.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43498 readers
1779 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 84 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

Oh! Oh! I've thought about this!

It would make more sense to build habitat craters, dug deep enough into the ground that the surface air pressure would be at a level tolerable to humans (even if the atmosphere mixture was bad, being able to simply wear a respirator instead of an entire suit would be huge).

I did some math once, on Mars a crater several miles deep would have a pressure similar to Earth's surface.

I think the Moon was like 40 miles or something, which at that point would probably run into other problems that I am not smart enough to worry about lol

[–] milkisklim@lemm.ee 33 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That sounds like a really cool Sci Fi concept!

Like the inverse of doing Floating airship cities on Venus where the altitude 's atmosphere is earth equivalent

Edit: equivalent pressure wise, not necessarily component wise

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 24 points 11 months ago

Craters also have the added benefit of sheltering the occupants from radiation and falling debris that the non-existent atmosphere couldn't protect from

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You won't even need to dig the hole! If you do this before much other habitations on the planet, you could precisely direct astroids to impact the same place to dig the whole for you. I think Cody's Lab did a video about it, but I can't find it right now.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Good odds there’s already a bunch of craters too, one of them will fit the bill

[–] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Awesome answer but could you still answer the question for those still curious?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 14 points 11 months ago

Well the craters could be domed off to maintain a healthy Earth-like atmosphere, and because the pressure is maintained by the depth of the crater the dome itself wouldn't actually have to hold the air pressure in against a low pressure environment.

Also, presumably the reason a habitat would be planet-side is to take advantage of mineral resources, so a lot of digging will happen anyway.

[–] lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Weren't they doing this in The Expanse?

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago

Getting closer to the core also means you get free heating.