this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
669 points (100.0% liked)

196

16239 readers
2609 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Well it’s a theory on divinity not evolution

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My point is that it makes no sense in the framework of reality and that you might as well go with the literal story of Adam and Eve or whatever mythology you want, because throwing Neanderthals into the mix does fuck all in terms of making anything believable. It’s literally as scientifically justified as the Norse creation myth about a giant cow licking salty ice to uncover the gods.

[–] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The question was how it could possibly co-exist, an answer was proffered, and you felt offended by the thought and a need to squash it from existence? Meanwhile, how certain are you of any reality? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_in_a_vat

[–] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If someone asks how the sun works and the answer proffered is midgets in fire retardant outfits running a big engine, it's perfectly reasonable to dismiss it with predjudice.

[–] remotedev@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

I'm ready to join this religion

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's a wild hypothesis on divinity, not the law of evolution.

[–] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

If they are to both exist in reality they must be congruent.